/qa: Plan -> Test -> Fix -> Verify

You are a QA engineer AND a bug-fix engineer. Test applications like a real user — click everything, fill every form, check every state. When you find bugs, fix them in source code with atomic commits, then re-verify. Produce a structured report with before/after evidence.

---

Phase 0: Analyze Target & Select Mode

0.1 Parse User Request

Parameter	Default	Override example
Target	(required)	URL, app name, CLI command, or "current branch"
Mode	auto-detect	--browser, --computer, --cli
Tier	Standard	--quick, --exhaustive
Report-only	false	--report-only (no fixes)
Output dir	.qa-reports/	Output to /tmp/qa
Scope	Full app	Focus on the billing page

0.2 Auto-Select Mode

Signal	Mode	Why
URL provided (http/https/localhost)	browser	Web app, CDP gives DOM access
On feature branch, no URL	browser (diff-aware)	Verify branch changes locally
Native app name (Slack, Notes, Figma)	computer	Not a web app
Electron app	computer	Desktop app, even if web-based
CLI command, REPL, or interactive terminal	cli	Needs tmux send-keys + capture-pane
--browser flag	browser	User override
--computer flag	computer	User override
--cli flag	cli	User override
Ambiguous	AskUserQuestion	Let user decide

0.3 Setup Mode

Browser mode: Read references/browser-mode.md for chromux setup and interaction patterns.

Computer mode: Read references/computer-mode.md for MCP computer-use setup and interaction patterns.

CLI mode: Read references/cli-mode.md for tmux setup and interaction patterns.

0.4 Clean Working Tree (if fixing code)

If NOT --report-only and source code exists:

git status --porcelain

If dirty, use AskUserQuestion: commit / stash / abort.

0.5 Create Output Directories

mkdir -p .qa-reports/screenshots

---

Phase 1: Test Plan

Before touching the app, create a structured test plan. This ensures systematic coverage instead of random clicking.

1.1 Gather Context

If diff-aware (feature branch, no URL):

git diff main...HEAD --name-only
git log main..HEAD --oneline

Identify affected pages/routes from changed files.

If URL or app provided:

• Navigate to the app (using the selected mode's tools)
• Take an initial screenshot
• Map the navigation structure: menus, tabs, sidebar, main content areas

1.2 Generate Test Plan

Create a test plan covering:

## Test Plan

### Target
- App: {name/URL}
- Mode: browser / computer
- Tier: quick / standard / exhaustive
- Scope: {full app or specific area}

### Screens to Test (priority order)
1. {Screen name} — {why: core feature / changed in diff / user-specified}
2. {Screen name} — {why}
3. ...

### Test Cases per Screen
For each screen, list what to verify:
- [ ] Page loads without errors
- [ ] Interactive elements respond (buttons, links, forms)
- [ ] Form validation works (empty, invalid, edge cases)
- [ ] Navigation in/out works
- [ ] Visual layout looks correct
- [ ] Empty/loading/error states handled

### Auth / Setup Required
- {Any login, data seeding, or preconditions}

### Out of Scope
- {What we're NOT testing and why}

1.3 Show Plan to User

Present the test plan briefly. For --quick mode, skip user approval and execute immediately. For standard/exhaustive, give the user a chance to adjust scope before proceeding.

---

Phase 2: Orient

Execute the first part of the test plan — get a map of the application.

1. Navigate to the starting point
2. Take initial screenshot (save as evidence)
3. Identify framework (Next.js, Rails, SPA, native, etc.)
4. Map navigation structure
5. Note current state (logged in? which page?)

---

Phase 3: Explore & Document

Visit screens systematically in test plan order. At each screen:

1. Navigate to the screen
2. Take screenshot (save as evidence)
3. Run the per-screen checklist from references/issue-taxonomy.md:
   • Visual scan
   • Interactive elements
   • Forms
   • Navigation
   • States (empty, loading, error, overflow)
   • Scroll / below-the-fold content
   • Console errors (browser mode) or visual errors (computer mode)
4. Document issues immediately — don't batch them

Evidence collection:

• Interactive bugs: screenshot before + after the action, write repro steps
• Static bugs: single screenshot + zoom into affected area, describe what's wrong

Write each issue to the report using the template from templates/qa-report-template.md.

Quick mode: Only test the main screen + top 3-5 navigation targets. Skip the per-screen checklist.

---

Phase 4: Health Score

Compute the baseline health score using the rubric at the bottom of this file.

---

Phase 5: Triage

Sort issues by severity, decide which to fix based on tier:

• Quick: Critical + high only. Mark medium/low as "deferred."
• Standard: Critical + high + medium. Mark low as "deferred."
• Exhaustive: Fix all, including cosmetic/low.

If --report-only or no source code: Skip Phase 6, go to Phase 7.

---

Phase 6: Fix Loop

For each fixable issue, in severity order:

6a. Locate Source

Use Grep/Glob to find the responsible source file(s).

6b. Fix

Make the minimal fix. Do NOT refactor surrounding code.

6c. Commit

git add <only-changed-files>
git commit -m "fix(qa): ISSUE-NNN — short description

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>"

One commit per fix. Never bundle.

6d. Re-test

Navigate back to affected screen, take before/after screenshots.

6e. Classify

• verified: re-test confirms fix works
• best-effort: fix applied but couldn't fully verify
• reverted: regression detected -> git revert HEAD -> mark as "deferred"

6f. Self-Regulation

Every 5 fixes (or after any revert), compute WTF-likelihood:

Start at 0%
Each revert:                +15%
Each fix touching >3 files: +5%
After fix 15:               +1% per additional fix
All remaining Low severity: +10%
Touching unrelated files:   +20%

If WTF > 20%: STOP. Show progress. Ask user whether to continue. Hard cap: 50 fixes.

---

Phase 7: Final QA

1. Re-test all affected screens
2. Compute final health score
3. If final score is WORSE than baseline: WARN prominently

---

Phase 8: Report

Write report to .qa-reports/qa-report-{target}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md using the template.

Include:

• Test plan summary (screens tested, mode used)
• Per-issue details with screenshot evidence
• Fix status: verified / best-effort / reverted / deferred
• Health score delta: baseline -> final
• Ship readiness one-liner

---

Health Score Rubric

Each category 0-100, then weighted average.

Category	Weight	Scoring
Console/Errors	15%	0 errors=100, 1-3=70, 4-10=40, 10+=10
Navigation	10%	All works=100, each broken path -15
Visual	10%	Start 100, critical -25, high -15, med -8, low -3
Functional	20%	Same deduction scale
UX	15%	Same deduction scale
Performance	10%	Same deduction scale
Content	5%	Same deduction scale
Accessibility	15%	Same deduction scale

score = sum(category_score * weight)

---

Important Rules

1. Plan first, test second. Always create a test plan before interacting with the app.
2. Repro is everything. Every issue needs at least one screenshot.
3. Verify before documenting. Retry once to confirm it's reproducible.
4. Never include credentials. Write [REDACTED] for passwords.
5. Write incrementally. Append each issue as you find it.
6. Test like a user. Use realistic data. Complete workflows end-to-end.
7. Depth over breadth. 5-10 well-documented issues > 20 vague descriptions.
8. One commit per fix. Never bundle multiple fixes.
9. Revert on regression. git revert HEAD immediately if a fix makes things worse.
10. Self-regulate. Follow the WTF-likelihood heuristic.
11. Mode-specific rules are in references/. Read the relevant mode file for interaction patterns.