Skill: Repository Scan — Cross-Stack Source Code Audit
SkillFiles & storageCross-stack source code asset audit that classifies every file, detects embedded third-party libraries, and delivers actionable verdicts per module.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Skill: Repository Scan — Cross-Stack Source Code Audit skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by brucesongs/kali-claw in skills/repo-scan/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Supplementary Files:
payloads.md— Repository scanning commands, classification scripts, and analysis payloads organized by scan phasetest-cases.md— Structured test cases for surface classification, dependency detection, hotspot mapping, and complete audit workflows
Summary
Repo Scan skill domain covering assessment operations.
Domain: assessment
Description
Cross-stack source code asset audit that classifies every file, detects embedded third-party libraries, and delivers actionable verdicts per module. This skill is used during white-box penetration testing and security code reviews to understand what code is present, what's third-party, and where security risks may hide.
Difference from security-review: security-review provides a checklist for auditing security patterns. This skill focuses on mapping and classifying the codebase itself — understanding what code exists, what's custom vs third-party, and where to focus security analysis.
Use Cases
- White-box penetration test preparation: understand the target codebase structure before deep analysis
- Open-source security audit: map the attack surface of a project before hunting vulnerabilities
- Third-party library inventory: identify embedded dependencies with known vulnerabilities
- M&A security due diligence: assess code quality and security of an acquired codebase
- Supply chain audit: verify what third-party code is actually running in the target
Core Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Command Example |
|---|---|---|
| semgrep | Pattern-based static analysis | semgrep --config=auto --json . |
| trivy | Dependency and container scanning | trivy fs . |
| grype | Vulnerability matching for packages | grype dir:. |
| trufflehog | Secret scanning in git history | trufflehog git file://. --since-commit HEAD~100 |
| gitleaks | Git secret detection | gitleaks detect --source . |
| cloc | Line counting by language | cloc --by-file . |
| gh | GitHub code search and analysis | gh search code "<pattern>" --language python |
Methodology
Repo Scan Four-Phase Process
Phase 1: Surface Classification
Enumerate and tag every file:
# Count lines of code by language
cloc --by-file . --json
# Identify file types and structure
find . -type f | sed 's/.*\.//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
# Detect third-party directories
find . -type d \( -name "vendor" -o -name "node_modules" -o -name "third_party" -o -name "external" -o -name "libs" -o -name "deps" \)
Classify each file as:
- Project code — written by the project authors
- Third-party code — embedded libraries, vendored dependencies
- Build artifacts — compiled output, generated files
- Configuration — settings, deployment files
- Test code — test fixtures, mock data
Phase 2: Library Detection
Identify embedded third-party libraries:
# Scan for known libraries and CVEs
trivy fs --scanners vuln .
grype dir:. --output json
# Check specific library versions
grep -r "version" vendor/*/package.json
grep -r "VERSION" libs/*/*.h
Phase 3: Security Hotspot Analysis
Focus review on high-value targets:
# Find authentication-related code
grep -rn "password\|auth\|token\|session\|login" --include="*.py" --include="*.js" --include="*.java" .
# Find database interaction
grep -rn "query\|execute\|cursor\|select\|insert\|update" --include="*.py" .
# Find file operations
grep -rn "open(\|readfile\|upload\|download\|include\(" --include="*.php" .
# Secret scanning
trufflehog filesystem . --json
gitleaks detect --source . --report-format json
Phase 4: Verdict and Report
Assign verdicts per module:
| Verdict | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Core Asset | Custom business logic, high security value | Deep security review required |
| Extract & Update | Vendored library, should be managed dependency | Replace with package manager; check CVEs |
| Rebuild | Duplicated or outdated wrapper code | Refactor; apply current security patterns |
| Deprecate | Dead code, unused modules | Remove to reduce attack surface |
Cross-Stack Coverage
| Stack | Key Files | Security Focus |
|---|---|---|
| C/C++ | Makefile, CMakeLists.txt, *.c, *.h | Buffer overflows, memory management |
| Java/Android | build.gradle, pom.xml, *.java | Deserialization, SQL injection |
| iOS | Podfile, *.swift, *.m | Keychain usage, certificate pinning |
| Web (JS/TS) | package.json, *.js, *.ts | XSS, prototype pollution, supply chain |
| Python | requirements.txt, *.py | Pickle deserialization, command injection |
| Go | go.mod, *.go | Race conditions, unsafe operations |
| PHP | composer.json, *.php | SQL injection, file inclusion |
| Rust | Cargo.toml, *.rs | Unsafe blocks, dependency auditing |
Defense Perspective
- Inventory everything: You can't secure what you don't know exists
- Pin dependencies: Lock exact versions to prevent supply chain attacks
- Remove dead code: Every line of code is a potential attack surface
- Separate concerns: Third-party code should be isolated from business logic
- Automate scanning: Integrate repo scanning into CI/CD pipelines
Report Template
# Repository Scan Report
*Target: [repo/project] | Date: [date] | Depth: [fast/standard/deep]*
## Executive Summary
[Total files, languages, third-party ratio, key findings]
## Classification Summary
| Category | Files | Lines of Code | Percentage |
|----------|-------|---------------|------------|
| Project Code | N | N | N% |
| Third-Party | N | N | N% |
| Build Artifacts | N | N | N% |
## Detected Libraries
| Library | Version | Known CVEs | Status |
|---------|---------|------------|--------|
| [Name] | [X.Y.Z] | [N CVEs] | [Outdated/Current] |
## Module Verdicts
| Module | Verdict | Rationale | Security Priority |
|--------|---------|-----------|-------------------|
| [Name] | Core Asset / Extract / Rebuild / Deprecate | [Why] | [High/Med/Low] |
## Security Hotspots
[High-priority files/directories for deep security review]
## Recommendations
[Prioritized action items based on verdicts and findings]
Detection Methods
Repository Activity Audit
- Mass cloning: Single token cloning many repos; suspicious pattern.
- Code search anomalies:
api.github.com/search/codeAPI abuse; rate limit violations. - Commit frequency: New contributor with many commits to security-sensitive files.
SIEM Detection Rules
- Splunk SPL:
index=github audit | stats count by actor, action | where action="git.clone" | sort -count - GitHub Advanced Security: Secret scanning, CodeQL alerts in PRs.
- GitGuardian / GitPrey: Secret detection in repositories.
Defense Evasion Techniques
Stealth Cloning
- Slow & distributed: Pace cloning; below per-token rate limit.
- Multiple tokens: Use multiple credentials; spread across many sources.
- Mirror via CI: Use legitimate CI pipeline to mirror repos; appears as routine sync.
Code Search Stealth
- Use authenticated API:
api.github.com/search/codeover browser search (rate-limited but less suspicious). - Local mirror: Clone repos locally; search offline.
- Fork + scan: Fork target repo privately; scan without revealing interest.
Orchestration
ECC Loop Pattern
- Pattern: Batch Processing (classify → detect → map → scan → verdict across multiple files/modules)
- Rationale: Repository scanning processes many files in batch — classification, dependency detection, and hotspot analysis all operate across the entire codebase simultaneously
- Integration: security-review (consumes repo-scan output for targeted review), terminal-ops (evidence capture), continuous-learning (pattern extraction from scan results)
Cross-Skill Pipeline
repo-scan → security-review → verification-loop → chronicle
↓ ↑
search-first (find tools) continuous-learning (persist patterns)
Quality Gate
- Pre-condition: Repository accessible, scanning tools installed
- Post-condition: All files classified, dependencies inventoried, hotspots mapped, verdicts assigned
- Verification: Third-party ratio calculated, secret scan completed, report generated
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 71
- Forks
- 18
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
repo-scan- Source
- github.com/brucesongs/kali-claw