Report Bug

SkillDev tools

Report a defect of reviewer or its plugin as an anonymized GitHub issue in mimfort/rag_for_git, after explicit user approval. Use when a reviewer tool breaks its own contract, a skill prescribes an impossible step, a stated invariant fails, or the user asks to report a reviewer bug.

Use Report Bug in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop

Free. Sign in, add Report Bug and connect your AI. About a minute.

Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex

Then ask your AI: use the Report Bug skill

Details

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.

Report BugStart free

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins in plugins/mimfort/rag_for_git/plugin/skills/report-bug/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.

Reply in Russian. This channel reports defects of the tool, never problems of the user's project. The server triages, anonymizes, assembles the issue and publishes it; the skill only carries the conversation and the approval.

The plugin runs on commercial codebases. Never pre-redact by hand and never paste source code, paths, repo/branch/file names, task keys, board URLs, hosts or tokens into the arguments in the hope of "cleaning them up" — pass what you observed and let the server anonymize it. The sanitizer is deterministic Python; a model rewriting the text first only hides what it should have removed.

  1. Decide whether it is ours. Pick kind from the tool contract, and pass it as observed — the server, not you, decides whether the channel speaks:
    • ours: tool_exception, contract_violation, skill_impossible, skill_contradiction, invariant_violation, deterministic_repro;
    • not ours: environment, external_service, user_code, permission, llm_behaviour. The one exception: the model misbehaved because a skill instruction was contradictory → still llm_behaviour, but set caused_by_skill_instruction=True (a prompt bug is our bug). A not_reported status is a normal outcome — report nothing to the user beyond a brief note.
  2. Pick severity. blocker (no workaround), degraded (workaround or manual fallback exists), contract (documentation and behaviour disagree, work continues). Offer blocker and degraded immediately; the server marks contract with defer=true — collect those and offer them as one batch at the end of the session.
  3. Preview (never skip). Call
    report_bug(kind=<kind>, summary=…, expected=…, actual=…, steps=[…], severity=<level>,
               tool=<mcp tool name>, skill_step=<skill and step>, error_class=<exception class>,
               details=…, repo=<owner/name>, branch=<branch>,
               client_environment={"orchestrator_model": …, "subagent_models": …,
                                   "mode": "subagent|inline", "cli": …, "cli_version": …},
               scale={"clusters": N, "files": N, "findings": N, "tasks": N},
               index_drift=<int or null>)
    
    without confirmed. Nothing is published. Handle the status: disabled — the channel is off for this repo or deploy, say so and stop; not_reported / suppressed — stop quietly.
  4. Show and ask. Show the returned issue_text in full, verbatim — no summary, no abridgement — plus the target repository, the environment_keys list, and the identity_notice: the issue is published from the user's GitHub account and their username will be visible in a public repository; the alternative is to decline and open the issue by hand from the prepared markdown. Offer to trim the Environment block: any lines, or the whole block. Then ask for an explicit yes.
  5. Publish only on an explicit yes. Repeat the same call with confirmed=True and, if the user trimmed anything, environment_exclude=[…] (or environment_include=[…]). In a headless, cron or background run there is no human to approve: pass non_interactive=True, which makes the server return a fallback markdown instead of publishing. Never publish autonomously in any mode.
    • published — report the issue URL.
    • commented — a matching open issue existed; report that a comment was added and give both URLs.
    • fallback — publication was not possible (no token, no rights, no network, headless): relay the reason, show the markdown and the fallback_url so the user can post it by hand. This is not a session failure — continue the work that was interrupted.
  6. On a refusal call report_bug(kind=…, summary=…, decline=True) with the same arguments, so the same symptom is not offered again in this session.

Every read is fail-open, and the confirmed=True call is the only write. If the channel itself fails, say so in one line and carry on with the original task.

Signals

GitHub stars
1k
Forks
316
Last commit
Oct 2026
Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
report-bug-hashgraph-online
Source
github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins