report-card
SkillDocs & knowledgeRender a finished BS report as a self-contained HTML page — score hero, filterable claims, readable on a phone, prints to a clean PDF. Use when the user wants to open, share, print, or show a report to someone who is not going to read a markdown table, or asks for "the HTML version", "something I can send", "a shareable page", or "make this readable".
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the report-card skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by serhiikorniienko/bullshit-detector in skills/publishing/report-card/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Turn bs-report-<slug>-<date>.md into one HTML file anybody can open.
The markdown is the artifact and stays the artifact — it is what tally.py checks, what gets
diffed against a later run, and what gets committed. This skill adds a reader-facing view of
that same file. It renders; it never edits, recounts, or adds. Every number on the page is copied
from the markdown verbatim.
Why this exists
A BS report is a five-column claims table. On a laptop that is fine. On a phone — which is where a shared link is actually opened — the Evidence column is unreadable, and the reader's first question ("what's wrong with it?") means scrolling twenty rows to find the two that matter.
Usage
uv run <this-skill-dir>/scripts/render_report.py ~/.bullshit-detector/reports/<YYYY>/bs-report-<slug>-<date>.md
Writes bs-report-<slug>-<date>.html beside the markdown. -o <path> puts it elsewhere. No install
step, no dependencies — the script is stdlib-only, runs under plain python3 as well as uv run,
and the page it produces makes no network requests. That combination is what lets it work in a
code-execution sandbox, where the HTML is the only thing the user can take away.
--openshows the page in the default browser. Where there is no browser — a sandbox, a headless host — it says so and the file is still written. It is skipped when the page already exists, because re-rendering is normal (the run line gets finalised after a first pass) and every open spawns another tab — three consecutive real runs left the user with two. The file updates in place; reload the tab you have.--reopenopens even when the page existed — for picking a report back up in a later session. Never treat that as a failure.--quietprints only the output path, for scripting.
The handoff block
By default the script prints the block that ends a detector run:
BS score 4/10 · Mostly fine
the macro data is real and mostly checks out; the narrative glue is crypto-Twitter.
Tally: 35 claims extracted, 34 individually source-checked — 22 confirmed, 5 plausible,
5 misleading, 2 false. 1 not checked.
run: 16m30s, searches 35, tools 65, coverage 1, per claim 29s
markdown file:///Users/…/bs-report-japans-money-is-collapsing-2026-07-31.md
page file:///Users/…/bs-report-japans-money-is-collapsing-2026-07-31.html
opened in your browser
Paste it; don't rebuild it. Every figure came out of the report that tally.py had just
recounted. A summary retyped from memory of what you wrote is wrong in the direction that flatters
the run — the same failure mode as the tally and the search count, one level up.
The paths are file:// URLs on purpose: terminals linkify a bare URL, so both files are one
cmd-click from opening. Don't shorten them to ~/… or hide them behind link text.
The compliance gate
Before rendering, the script runs the report through the detector's tally.py and refuses to
render a report that fails it:
REFUSED: bs-report-our-solar-system-2026-07-31.md does not pass tally.py.
✗ run line: 25 claims individually source-checked from 21 searches — every claim
carrying a verdict needs its own search, so this reports more verification than
was performed
Exit 3. This is the point of the gate: a page this presentable, built from a report that fails its own arithmetic, launders a broken report into something that looks authoritative. Fix what the gate names and re-run.
--forcerenders anyway and prints the failures as warnings.--no-checkskips the gate — for markdown that isn't a BS report.--tally <path>or$BULLSHIT_DETECTOR_TALLYif it can't be found automatically.
If tally.py isn't installed at all — this skill can be installed without the detector — the
script warns and renders. A missing validator is a reason to warn, not a reason to stop someone
viewing a report they already have.
--og-image <absolute-url> adds a link-preview image. Only useful once the page is hosted
somewhere; skip it for local files.
Then tell the user the path and that it opens in any browser. On macOS open <path> does it.
What the page adds over the markdown
- Score hero — the number at the size it deserves, coloured by the RUBRIC band (Solid / Mostly fine / Hype-heavy / Mostly bullshit / Fabricated), with the one-line verdict beside it.
- Verdict filter chips —
Problemsshows only ❌ and 🟠.Load-bearing onlyhides the incidental table. This is the whole reason a non-technical reader gets through the report. - Claims as cards under 900px, as a table above it. Same rows, same order, same text.
- Print stylesheet — Cmd-P gives a clean PDF with the URLs printed after each link. Filters are deliberately ignored when printing: a filtered PDF is a report that quietly dropped rows, which is the one artifact this tool must never produce.
- Link-preview tags — a pasted link shows
<title> — N/10and the verdict line instead of a bare URL.
Rules
- Render, don't re-report. If a number looks wrong, the markdown is wrong — fix it there and re-render. Never correct it in the HTML.
- The markdown is still the source of truth. Say so when handing over the file; the HTML is a
view, and only the markdown is what
tally.pyvalidated. - Don't reach for
--forceto make a refusal go away. The gate is naming a real defect in the report. Rendering past it produces a page that looks more trustworthy than the thing behind it, which is the failure this whole tool exists to catch. - Don't publish anything without being asked. People point this tool at unpublished drafts, internal docs and things they were sent in confidence. Writing a local file is not publishing; putting it on the internet is a separate decision that belongs to the user, per report.
- The renderer is deliberately lenient — a report missing its score or version stamp still renders,
with a note on the page saying which fields were missing. That is a viewer's job.
tally.pyis the strict one, and the two must not swap roles.
Known limits
- The claims table must keep its
| # | Claim | Type | Verdict | Evidence |shape — the#column is how the renderer tells a claims table from any other table, and the verdict glyph is read from its own cell, never from anywhere else in the row. - Reports in any language render fine (system fonts, no bundled webfont).
- Images are not generated here. The social carousel lives in share.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 142
- Forks
- 10
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
report-card- Source
- github.com/serhiikorniienko/bullshit-detector