Gather Context

!`git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_GIT"`

!`git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_GIT"`

---

Report Quality Check

Analyze a review report for quality issues -- noise, false positives, overkill suggestions, and findings that exist to appear thorough rather than to help the developer.

Announce: "Using the report-check skill to audit report quality."

---

Step 0 -- Validate Input

If $ARGUMENTS is empty, print:

Usage: /report-check <path-to-review-report.md> Analyzes a review report for quality issues -- noise, false positives, overkill suggestions.

Stop here.

If $ARGUMENTS contains a file path:

1. Read the file using the Read tool.
2. If the file does not exist or is not readable, print:

   Report file not found: {path} Stop here.

---

Step 1 -- Read Report

1. Read the full report file.
2. Extract the branch name from the ## Review Context section if present (look for a Branch: line).
3. Note the report structure: findings grouped by severity, verdict, filtered findings section.

---

Step 2 -- Reconstruct Diff (optional)

If git is available AND a branch name was extracted from the report:

1. Determine the base branch:

   !`git rev-parse --verify main 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_MAIN"`
   

   Use main if it exists, otherwise master.

2. Get the diff:

   !`git diff {base}...{branch} 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_DIFF"`
   

3. If the diff is non-empty, it will be passed to the agent for cross-referencing.

Print status:

• With diff: Analyzing report with diff cross-reference...
• Without diff: Analyzing report (no diff available for cross-reference)...

If git is unavailable or no branch info exists, proceed without diff. The agent works report-only -- Phase 2 accuracy checks will be limited.

---

Step 3 -- Dispatch Agent

Spawn the quiver:report-checker agent with a self-contained prompt containing:

1. The full report content, clearly delimited:

   <report>
   {full report markdown}
   </report>
   

2. The diff (if available), clearly delimited:

   <diff>
   {full diff output}
   </diff>
   

   If no diff is available, include:

   <diff>
   No diff available for cross-referencing.
   </diff>
   

3. Instruction: "Audit this review report for quality. Apply all three phases (substance verification, accuracy check, proportionality audit). Return structured findings using your output format."

---

Step 4 -- Present Results

If agent returns zero issues:

Report passed quality audit -- no issues found.

If agent returns issues, display the structured findings to the user.

Use AskUserQuestion:

Quality audit found {N} issues in the report. What would you like to do?

Buttons:

• Apply fixes to the report
• Show details only
• Skip -- keep as-is

Handle each option:

Apply fixes:

1. For each issue with action REMOVE: delete the finding from the report file.
2. For each issue with action DOWNGRADE: change the finding's severity and move it to the correct severity section.
3. For each issue with action REWRITE: replace the finding's recommendation text with the corrected version.
4. After applying all fixes, recalculate:
   • Findings overview counts in ## Review Context
   • Disposition counts in ## Review Context, and the **Deferred:** line under the fix order table
   • Severity section contents (move downgraded findings, remove deleted ones)
   • Recommended Fix Order table (remove entries for deleted/downgraded findings)
   • Verdict line (recompute based on remaining finding severities)
5. Write the updated report back to the same file path.
6. Proceed to Step 5.

Show details:

1. Print the full audit output.
2. Re-ask via AskUserQuestion:

   Apply the suggested fixes? Buttons: Apply fixes / Skip -- keep as-is

Skip: Stop. Report unchanged.

---

Step 5 -- Verify (if fixes applied)

1. Read the modified report file back using the Read tool.
2. Confirm no {placeholder} text remains in the report.
3. Print:

   Report updated: {N} findings removed, {M} downgraded, {K} rewritten.