research-and-ingest
SkillDocs & knowledgeFind authoritative sources on the web (or via documentation MCP servers like Context7/DeepWiki), download or snapshot them when allowed, normalize them into clean Markdown, and stage them for the library-wiki. Use whenever a new library/spec/API/standard is being added, a wiki page is stale, an ADR needs current evidence, or a behavior best practice needs verification. Always prefer official upstream sources and version-pinned content over training data.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the research-and-ingest skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by llopresto87/cypress in skills/research-and-ingest/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
This skill is invoked by research-scout to fetch external content
in a disciplined way. The output of this skill is two artifacts:
raw snapshots in docs/graph/sources/raw/ (when license allows) and
normalized summaries in docs/graph/sources/normalized/, plus a row in
docs/graph/sources/index.md. The wiki page (created by library-wiki)
draws from these.
When to apply this skill
- A new dependency is being evaluated or added.
- A wiki page's "Last reviewed" date is older than the project's review cadence, or its pin no longer matches the lockfile.
- An ADR is being written and needs current evidence.
- An LLM/VLM feature is being designed and needs the provider's current behavior documentation.
- A spec is being authored and refers to a standard (RFC, schema, protocol) the project hasn't read recently.
Source ranking
When two sources disagree, prefer in this order:
- Official upstream documentation for the exact version in use.
- Official upstream source code (especially public API surface, examples directory, CHANGELOG).
- Official upstream blog posts and migration guides.
- Security advisories from trusted bodies (CVE, CISA, OWASP, official upstream advisories).
- Well-maintained community resources with current dates.
- Recent blog posts from credible authors.
- Anything else, marked clearly with reliability
communityormirror.
Never cite a forum answer older than a year for a fast-moving library without verifying against current docs. Never paste a forum answer into the wiki without testing it.
Workflow (per source)
1. Identify
For each source you intend to ingest, note:
- Authority (who maintains it).
- Version coverage (which versions of the library/spec it covers).
- Date (when it was last updated upstream).
- License (whether snapshotting is allowed).
- Slug (the filename you'll use locally).
2. Fetch
Use the host tool's web-fetch capability. If a documentation MCP
server is configured (Context7, DeepWiki, llms.txt provider,
similar), prefer it for fast, version-aware retrieval. The MCP
server does not replace the wiki; it just gets you upstream content
faster than crawling.
3. Snapshot (when allowed)
When the license permits, write the raw content to
docs/graph/sources/raw/<slug>-<retrieved-date>.<ext>. Acceptable
extensions: .md, .html, .pdf, .txt, .json. Strip nothing
from the raw file — preserve provenance. When the license does not
permit — or the host retrieved through an MCP summary and holds no
page to keep — say so in the raw: line of the normalized metadata
block. A snapshot with neither the raw file nor the reason is
UNJUSTIFIED at the coverage gate: the reason recorded is what makes
the omission a decision instead of a habit.
4. Normalize
Produce docs/graph/sources/normalized/<slug>.md:
- Clean Markdown, no navigation chrome, no ads, no tracking pixels, no boilerplate footers.
- Keep upstream headings; drop everything else that is not decision-relevant.
- At the top, the metadata block:
---
source-title: <title>
source-url: <url>
source-maintainer: <name>
source-version-coverage: <e.g. "1.4 - 1.6">
retrieved: YYYY-MM-DD
license: <SPDX or "see source">
raw: raw/<slug>-<retrieved-date>.<ext> | withheld — <why: the license, a host without fetch, an MCP summary with no page behind it>
reliability: official | community-trusted | community | mirror
---
5. Register
Add a row to docs/graph/sources/index.md:
| <title> | <url> | <maintainer> | YYYY-MM-DD | <version> | <reliability> | <relevance> | <one-line notes> |
6. Draft, then hand back
Draft the wiki page from the normalized sources (skill.library-wiki
says what each section owes) and end the turn with the handback
payload naming the page, the sources index rows, and tester as
recommended_next for the smoke test — the scout is a leaf; the
opus-class docs-librarian finalizes the page in the close-out, the
phase order being ingest-library.flow's.
Documentation MCP servers (when available)
If the project has any of these configured, prefer them for fetching upstream content:
- Context7 (
@upstash/context7-mcp): current docs for many libraries, addressable by library ID and version. Use the library-ID form for precision. - DeepWiki: open-source repository summaries.
llms.txtproviders: projects that publish a machine-readable docs index.
When you use one, cite the source in the normalized file's metadata with the MCP server name and the date.
The local wiki is still authoritative for the project. The MCP server gets you upstream content faster; the wiki page is your distillation of what this project actually does with that content.
Disagreement handling
If two sources disagree:
- Note the version coverage of each.
- Prefer the more recent official source.
- If a security advisory disagrees with the docs, the advisory wins.
- If the disagreement persists, record both with their versions in the wiki page, and open a question in grill.md §12.
Source reconciliation (lightweight drift check)
Between full research passes, run a cheap periodic reconciliation: diff the currently-resolved dependency versions and manifests/locks against the versions recorded in the library wiki, without re-running research or re-fetching upstream. Classify each line:
- no mismatch — the wiki pin still matches what resolves; nothing to do.
- refresh before the next API-affecting change — the pin has drifted but no work is about to touch that surface; flag it, don't re-ingest yet.
- superseded — treat as historical — the recorded version is gone from the resolved set; mark the wiki content as historical.
This catches silent pin drift that accumulates between full passes, at a
fraction of the cost. It is distinct from a full research pass (which
re-fetches and re-normalizes upstream content) and from
validate-knowledge (which tests whether the wiki prose is navigable
and correct, not whether its pins are still current).
Anti-patterns
- Ingesting paywalled or login-walled content without the user's explicit OK.
- Paraphrasing past the point where the paraphrase still says what the source said.
- Skipping the version pin. "Latest" is not a version.
- Snapshotting forbidden content. When the license disallows snapshotting, link only; do not store.
- Ingesting from one source per topic. For non-trivial topics, cross-check against the source code.
Reference files
docs/graph/templates/library-page.template.md— where this skill's output ultimately lands.docs/graph/protocols/ingest-library.md— the parent protocol.docs/graph/agents/10-research-scout.md— the agent that runs this.docs/graph/skills/library-wiki.md— the wiki-maintenance skill.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 31
- Forks
- 1
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
research-and-ingest- Source
- github.com/llopresto87/cypress