Academic Literature Search
SkillSearchALWAYS use for ANY request to find academic papers - "find papers on X", "what does the literature say about X", "is there research on this", "who has written about X", "find me cites for this claim", "literature search", "any papers in the journals I like", "top journals only", "recent work on X", "has anyone studied this". Use proactively before answering an empirical or doctrinal question from memory, and never run scholar/consensus/paperpile by hand in sequence - this skill parallelizes them. NOT for open-web report writing (deep-research).
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Academic Literature Search skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by edwinhu/workflows in skills/research/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
What this skill carries — grep references/ for any subject the names below miss:
!d=${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}; command -v skill-toc >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec skill-toc "$d"; s=$HOME/.claude/skills/plugin-utils/bin/skill-toc; [ -x "$s" ] && exec "$s" "$d"; echo "(skill-toc unavailable: references and scripts are NOT listed here — install the plugin-utils plugin, or start a new session so its bin/ reaches PATH)"
Multi-source academic search with deduplication, DOI resolution, and journal filtering.
Always read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/trusted-journals.local.md before presenting results.
IRON LAW: Always Use the Script
NEVER run the sources manually in sequence. ALWAYS use the research script. This is not negotiable.
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "<query>" [--n 50] [--min-citations N]
The script parallelizes all sources and DOI resolution automatically. Doing it manually serializes everything and triples wall time.
Sources
| Source | Tool | Strength | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
scholar lookup | Keyword/citation-ranked | Finance classics, foundational papers | ✅ |
consensus CLI | Empirical corpus, sorted by citations | Accounting/finance empirical literature; law reviews (T14 flagships are indexed) | ✅ |
| Paperpile bib | Personal library (My Library.bib) | Papers already in your collection | ✅ |
scholar search | NL semantic | Conceptual literature, unindexed specialty reviews | opt-in (--scholar-search) |
scholar search is opt-in because it shares rate limits with scholar lookup and 429s when run in parallel. Add --scholar-search when you specifically want semantic/NL results.
Trusted-journal filtering
--journals-only restricts the consensus source server-side to the journals
listed in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/trusted-journals.local.md
(one exact name per line, # comments). Use it whenever the user asks for
"journals I like", "relevant journals only", or "top journals" — it returns --n
trusted papers instead of an unfiltered set that collapses to a handful once
you mark ★.
The other sources are unaffected: scholar and the Paperpile bib still run
unfiltered, so the union stays broad. To add a journal, verify the exact indexed
name with ~/projects/consensus-cli/consensus journals "<partial>" before
appending it — an unindexed name matches nothing, silently.
Output Schema
The script outputs a JSON array. Each paper has:
{
"title": "...",
"authors": ["..."],
"year": 2023,
"journal": "...", // original journal label (may be SSRN)
"journal_resolved": "...", // CrossRef-resolved journal (present if SSRN label was resolved)
"doi": "...",
"citations": 150,
"takeaway": "...",
"url": "...",
"sources": ["lookup", "consensus"] // all sources that returned this paper
}
LLM Review Step (After Script)
After running the script, read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/trusted-journals.local.md and cross-reference each paper's effective journal (use journal_resolved if present, else journal) against the trusted list:
- ★ = journal matches trusted list
- Papers in
sources: ["lookup", "consensus"](multiple sources) = higher confidence - Papers from
bibsource = already in user's library (flag with 📚)
Presentation Format
★ [Title](url) — Authors (Year), *Journal*, N citations [sources]
> Takeaway: ...
📚 ★ [Title](url) — Authors (Year), *Journal* [in your library]
> Takeaway: ...
Trusted papers first (sorted by citations desc), then non-trusted in a collapsed table.
Red Flags
- About to run the sources manually in sequence → STOP. That serializes the work and triples wall time; run
uv run python3 research.py "<query>". - About to call
mcp__consensus__search→ STOP. It is rate-limited to 3 results; the script uses the CLI binary automatically. - About to present results before reading trusted-journals.local.md → STOP. The ★ trusted-journal signals come from that file; read it first, always.
- User asked for their journals only, and you ran unfiltered then dropped most results → STOP. Pass
--journals-only; it filters server-side so all--nresults count. - About to append a journal to trusted-journals.local.md without verifying it → STOP.
consensus journals "<partial>"first; a wrong name fails silently. - About to use the
journalfield whenjournal_resolvedis present → STOP. The SSRN label hides the real venue; always preferjournal_resolved.
Common Patterns
# Standard search
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "mandatory disclosure"
# With citation floor
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "poison pill" --min-citations 50
# Trusted journals only (server-side filter on the consensus source)
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "board independence" --journals-only
# More results from Consensus
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "corporate governance" --n 100
# Disable streaming (wait for all sources, output pretty-printed JSON)
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "mandatory disclosure" --no-stream
Streaming Mode (default)
Without --stream, the script waits for all four sources before emitting anything — Consensus takes ~60s, so fast sources (bib <1s, Scholar ~10s) sit idle.
With --stream, the script emits one NDJSON line per event as it happens:
{"event": "source", "source": "bib", "papers": [...]}
{"event": "source", "source": "scholar-lookup", "papers": [...]}
{"event": "source", "source": "scholar-search", "papers": [...]}
{"event": "source", "source": "consensus", "papers": [...]}
{"event": "final", "papers": [...]}
sourceevents: raw papers from each source as it completes (may have duplicates across sources)finalevent: deduplicated + CrossRef-resolved unified set
Process source events as they arrive to present early results; use final for the complete deduplicated list. Pass --no-stream for batch mode (pretty-printed JSON after all sources complete).
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 21
- Forks
- 4
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
- Hacker News mentions
- 20
ahel review
K6low
bundled executables the agent is told to run
Automated review, not a security audit. Ruleset v1+k2.
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
research-edwinhu- Source
- github.com/edwinhu/workflows