Reviewing Work
SkillProductivityReview work — check task completion, run lint/build, mark reviewer remarks. Use after /unipi:work completes.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Reviewing Work skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by neuron-mr-white/unipi in packages/workflow/skills/review-work/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Review what was built, verify task completion, run codebase checks, add reviewer remarks.
Boundaries
This skill MAY: read codebase, run checks (lint, build, test, docker), write reviewer remarks to plan docs, run bash for git operations (checkout worktree branch). This skill MAY NOT: edit code, implement features, create new files.
Command Format
/unipi:review-work plan:<path>(optional) <string(greedy)>(optional)
plan:<path)— specific plan to review (auto-suggested)string(greedy)— scope (e.g., "only review auth tasks" or "just check builds")- If no plan provided → agent finds latest plan or asks user
- Runs in current session (or worktree session if still active)
Phase 1: Load Plan & Switch Branch
- If
plan:arg provided, read that plan - If not, list plans in
.unipi/docs/plans/and ask user - Read plan fully — understand tasks, acceptance criteria, current status
- Read
workbranch:from plan frontmatter:- If
workbranch:exists and is not empty → switch to that branch/worktree - If
workbranch:missing or empty → review on current branch (main) - To switch:
git checkout {workbranch}or use worktree path
- If
Exit: On correct branch. Plan loaded.
Ralph Status Check
If a ralph loop was used for this work (check .unipi/ralph/ for a matching state file):
- Read
.unipi/ralph/{name}.state.json— note iteration count, reflection findings - Read
.unipi/ralph/{name}.md— check checklist completion - Note any items marked incomplete or abandoned across iterations
- Include this loop context in your reviewer remarks
Phase 2: Check Task Completion
For each task in plan:
- Read acceptance criteria
- Verify against actual implementation
- Determine status:
- Done — all criteria met →
completed: - Partially Done X/Y — some steps complete, others not
- Unstarted — nothing done →
unstarted: - Failed — attempted but broken →
failed: - Awaiting User — needs user action →
awaiting_user: - Blocked — waiting on dependency →
blocked: - Skipped — intentionally not done →
skipped:
- Done — all criteria met →
If string(greedy) scope provided, only check matching tasks.
Phase 3: Run Codebase Checks
Run project's verification suite:
- Lint —
npm run lintor equivalent - Type check —
tsc --noEmitor equivalent - Tests —
npm testor equivalent - Build —
npm run buildor equivalent - Docker —
docker build .if Dockerfile exists
Report results. If any fail:
- Note which checks failed
- Identify which tasks are affected
- Don't fix — just report
Phase 4: Write Reviewer Remarks
Add REVIEWER-REMARK at the end of the plan document, behind a divider:
---
## Reviewer Remarks
REVIEWER-REMARK: Partially Done 3/5
- Tasks 1-3 complete, verified against acceptance criteria
- Task 4 stuck: API endpoint returns 500, needs investigation
- Task 5 unstarted: depends on Task 4
Codebase Checks:
- ✓ Lint passed
- ✓ Type check passed
- ✗ Tests failed: 2 failing in auth.test.ts
- ✓ Build passed
- ✓ Docker build passed
Status Format
REVIEWER-REMARK: <Done | Partially Done X/Y | Unstarted>
Followed by description explaining the status.
Phase 5: Handoff
Based on review results, use ask_user new_session options when available so the selected next workflow command can be queued automatically. If ask_user is unavailable, present the same choices conversationally and keep copyable commands visible.
If all tasks done and checks pass:
If workbranch is set (worktree):
"All tasks complete and verified. Ready to merge back to main."
Offer:
ask_user({
question: "Merge this worktree now?",
options: [
{ label: "Proceed to /unipi:worktree-merge", value: "merge", action: "new_session", prefill: "/unipi:worktree-merge" },
{ label: "Consolidate learnings", value: "consolidate", action: "new_session", prefill: "/unipi:consolidate" },
{ label: "Done for now", value: "done", action: "end_turn" },
],
allowFreeform: false,
})
Copyable fallback:
/unipi:worktree-merge
If workbranch is empty (main branch):
"All tasks complete and verified. Changes already on main — no merge needed."
Offer /unipi:consolidate as a new_session handoff when available. Copyable fallback:
/unipi:consolidate
Either way, user can consolidate learnings:
/unipi:consolidate
If tasks incomplete or checks fail:
"Tasks remaining and/or checks failing. Continue work?"
Offer the applicable /unipi:work ... command as a new_session handoff when available.
If workbranch is set:
/unipi:work worktree:<branch> specs:<plan-path>
If workbranch is empty (main):
/unipi:work specs:<plan-path>
If scoped review complete:
"Scoped review complete. Run full review or continue work?"
Offer both commands as new_session options when available:
/unipi:review-work plan:<plan-path> (full review)
/unipi:work specs:<plan-path> (continue work)
Notes
- Reviewer remarks append to end of plan — don't modify existing content
- Check results are factual — report pass/fail, don't diagnose
- This is a checkpoint, not a fix pass — work continues via
/unipi:work
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 64
- Forks
- 15
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
review-work-neuron-mr-white- Source
- github.com/neuron-mr-white/unipi