Roblox Code Review

Route a Roblox code review to the right domain skills and produce a structured report. Apply relevant lenses based on what changed, not all every time.

When to Load

• User asks for code review on Roblox/Luau code
• User asks to audit security, performance, networking, monetization, or data persistence
• User asks about Roblox best practices for remotes, data saving, or code organization

Quick Reference

Routing: Load These Skills for Each Lens

Lens	Load
Security audit	roblox-security
Remote validation	roblox-networking
Data persistence	roblox-data
Cross-server state	roblox-server-data
Monetization	roblox-monetization
Performance	roblox-performance
Luau correctness	roblox-luau-core, roblox-luau-types
Architecture	roblox-architecture

Static-Analysis Limits

• Static scans can flag numeric require calls, dynamic-code markers, obfuscation-like names, cleanup tokens, and duplicate files; these are provenance or review signals, not verdicts.
• Trace the containing function, authority boundary, reachability, and lifecycle before assigning severity.
• Label search-only findings separately from observed runtime behavior, test results, and unavailable evidence.
• Vertical slice review: For a player-facing change, trace input → UI/world feedback → remote or simulation → authoritative state → persistence → cleanup. Review the real path; file or class co-occurrence is not proof that a runtime connection exists.

Output Format

1. READY / NOT READY
2. Critical blockers (security, data loss, crashes)
3. Warnings (leaks, bottlenecks, deprecated APIs)
4. Unverified risks and unavailable evidence
5. Findings with specific fixes

Severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low. For each finding: file + line, what's wrong, impact, and the smallest correct fix. The routed domain skill owns detailed checks.