security

SkillSecurity

Defensive security engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when THREAT MODELING a system or feature; making security-relevant design decisions (auth, crypto, trust boundaries, attack surface); reviewing code for vulnerabilities (injection, IDOR, secrets, the OWASP classes); hardening operations (secrets management, detection, patching, incident response); or judging whether a security control/program is real or theater. Also invoke BEFORE any offensive-flavored request (pentest, exploit, credential testing) to apply the authorization gate. Also invoke when designing, reviewing, or hardening an LLM/agent system that reads untrusted content or holds tool/MCP access (prompt injection, excessive agency, MCP supply chain).

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the security skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by telagod/code-abyss in skills/_kernel/security/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Rule content lives in the seven files below; this SKILL.md only routes (doctrine/04-maintenance.md governs edits to this bundle too).

First, always: scope.md §1 — the authorization gate. It fires on ANY request mentioning exploits, payloads, bypassing auth/WAF/filters, cracking, brute force, credential/password testing, scanning a target, or accessing a system the requester didn't build in this session — recognize the moment even when the ask is phrased as "just write a script." Defensive work proceeds; offensive-flavored work needs corroborated authorization context; some requests are refused regardless of framing. Pass the gate before applying anything else in this bundle.

Route by moment

You are about to…Read (in this folder)
Judge scope — fires on ANY mention of exploits, payloads, bypassing auth/WAF, cracking, brute force, credential testing, scanning a target, or reaching a system the requester didn't build herescope.md §1
Decide what to protect, from whom, and where to spendthreat-model.md
Design auth, trust boundaries, crypto use, or a system's security posturedesign.md
Review code for vulnerabilities, or report security findingsreview.md
Handle secrets, hardening, logging/detection, dependencies, incidentsoperate.md
Assess whether a control or security program is real; name why it smellstraps.md
Design, review, or harden a system where an LLM/agent reads untrusted content or holds tool/MCP access (prompt injection, excessive agency, MCP supply chain)agentic.md

A new system usually runs threat-model.md (four questions) → design.mdreview.md before ship → operate.md in production.

Scope and neighbors

Security judgment for building and defending systems. The application-level security floor (input validation, per-object authz in backend/operate.md §5; rate limits in backend/operate.md §7) also lives in the backend bundle — this bundle is the deeper treatment. Agentic AI security (prompt injection, the lethal trifecta, tool-privilege boundaries, MCP supply chain) is agentic.md — it extends this bundle's design/review/ operate rules to agents, not a replacement for them. General verification discipline is methods/verify.md; whether to delegate → doctrine.

The stance

Attackers take the cheapest path; defenders must be honest about which door is open. Threat model before controls (threat-model.md), assume breach (scope.md §3), make the safe way the easy way (design.md §3) — and never confuse a control that exists with a control that works (traps.md meta-signal). A clean review means "nothing found where I looked," never "secure" (scope.md §5).

Signals

GitHub stars
239
Forks
32
Last commit
Jul 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
security-telagod
Source
github.com/telagod/code-abyss