Task: Ship the current main branch

SkillDev tools

Safely bring main up to date, commit intended pending changes, and push to origin/main — resolving any rebase conflicts autonomously and stopping only when a decision genuinely needs a human. Use when the user explicitly asks to ship the current main branch or invokes the repository's ship workflow.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Task: Ship the current main branch skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by bex-co/bex in .claude/skills/ship/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Bring the local main up to date, commit any pending work, and push to origin/main. A successful push is the end of the ship — do not watch CI, do not monitor the deploy, do not chase runs to green. Report the pushed HEAD and stop.

Conflicts are yours to resolve — do not hand them back

A rebase or merge conflict is a normal part of shipping, not a reason to stop. When one appears, resolve it yourself using the procedure in Step 3, validate the result, continue the rebase, and push. Never pause at a conflict to ask "how should I resolve this?", never list the conflicted files and wait, and never leave the rebase half-finished for the user to pick up.

The only conditions under which /ship stops before the push are:

  1. Not on main (Step 1).
  2. Two sides of a conflict encode materially different behavior (not just different text), repository evidence — surrounding code, tests, docs, the commits on each side — cannot tell you which one is intended, and picking wrong would ship a real bug. Text-only disagreements, docs, comments, formatting, imports, generated output, lockfiles, and changes that simply coexist are never in this category.
  3. Resolution needs credentials, generated artifacts, or external state you cannot produce locally.
  4. The only way forward is a destructive action the safety rules forbid without confirmation.

Anything else — including many conflicted files, unfamiliar code, or a long rebase — you work through to completion. When you do stop, stop on exactly one narrow question with the evidence attached, and leave the worktree and rebase state intact.

Session-aware mode

If you (the agent) made the pending changes yourself earlier in this conversation, you already know what changed and why — do not re-derive it from git:

  • Skip the git diff --stat / git diff --cached --stat calls in Step 2. Run only git status as a sanity check.
  • In Step 4, stage exactly the files you edited this session (by name) and write the commit message from your session knowledge.
  • If git status shows modified/untracked files you did not touch this session, fall back to full inspection for those files (or ask the user) before staging anything beyond your own edits.

Only when the working tree contains changes you didn't make (fresh session, external edits) do the full Step 2 inspection.

Step 1 — Verify branch

git branch --show-current

If not on main, STOP and ask the user whether to switch or abort. Do not silently switch branches.

Step 2 — Inspect state

git status

Session-aware: if every change listed by git status is one you made this session, stop here — no diff commands needed.

Otherwise, inspect the unfamiliar changes:

git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat

If the working tree is clean and there's nothing to commit, skip Step 4: still do Step 3 (pull) and Step 5 (push).

Step 3 — Pull latest with rebase

git pull --rebase origin main

If the pull/rebase has conflicts, resolve them yourself and continue shipping — the user expects /ship to handle this without being asked. A conflict by itself is never a reason to stop, report back, or ask what to do.

  1. Inspect git status, the unmerged-file list (git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U), each combined diff, and relevant surrounding code/history. For difficult cases, inspect both index stages (git show :2:<path> and git show :3:<path>) and the commits being replayed.
  2. Infer the intent of both sides and produce the smallest coherent merge that preserves both whenever possible. Follow current repository conventions and update dependent code, tests, generated outputs, or documentation when the combined result requires it.
  3. Do not resolve wholesale with --ours, --theirs, --strategy=ours, or by blindly choosing the newer side. Use a side-specific version only when inspection shows that it is the complete intended result for that file.
  4. Remove all conflict markers, run the most relevant formatting, generation, and tests that are practical, and review the resolved diff for accidental loss.
  5. Stage only the resolved paths explicitly, run git rebase --continue (with a non-interactive editor if needed), and repeat until the rebase completes. If an autostash is restored with conflicts after the rebase, resolve and validate those conflicts with the same care, but do not run git rebase --continue when no rebase is active.

Exhaust repository evidence and reasonable repairs before escalating. Escalate only under the stop conditions listed at the top of this skill: competing resolutions would materially change behavior and the intended choice cannot be inferred safely, or resolution requires unavailable credentials/external state. If you escalate, leave the worktree and rebase state intact, name the exact files and the competing semantics, and ask one narrow decision question — never a generic "what should I do?" Do not abort the rebase unless the user directs it.

Step 4 — Stage and commit (if changes pending)

If there are unstaged changes, stage only the relevant files explicitly. Do not use git add -A or git add . (avoid sweeping in .env, secrets, or unrelated files).

Generate a Conventional Commits message — from your session knowledge if you made the changes (session-aware mode), otherwise from the diff. Honor $ARGUMENTS as additional context if supplied.

  • Briefly describe UI before/after for frontend changes.
  • !!Important!! Never mention Generated with Claude Code or Co-Authored-By.
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<message>
EOF
)"

If a pre-commit hook fails, fix the underlying issue and create a NEW commit. Do not use --no-verify or --amend.

Step 5 — Push

git push origin main

If the push is rejected (non-fast-forward), re-run Step 3, resolve any conflicts using its procedure, and retry push. Do not force-push to main.

Step 6 — Report

Once the push succeeds, the ship is done. Print one line — the shipped HEAD SHA + subject:

Shipped: a1b2c3d feat: add tp-backend IDL + CLI

Do not watch CI runs, monitor the deploy, or report on them.

Safety rules

  • Never git push --force to main.
  • Never --no-verify or skip hooks.
  • Never git reset --hard or git checkout . without user confirmation.
  • Investigate ambiguity using repository state and history before escalating. For untracked files, divergent history, or unexpected remote state, continue when the safe intent is evident; otherwise stop before destructive action and ask one narrow, evidence-backed question.
  • A merge/rebase conflict is never, on its own, a reason to stop — resolve it (Step 3). Stop only under the conditions listed in "Conflicts are yours to resolve".

Optional User Context

$ARGUMENTS

Signals

GitHub stars
557
Forks
64
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
ship-bex-co
Source
github.com/bex-co/bex