Simulink Profiler Analyzer

SkillAI & models

Analyze Simulink Profiler results to find simulation bottlenecks or compare two profiler sessions to identify regressions. Use when asked to profile a Simulink model, analyze profiler data, find what is slow, or compare simulation performance between two runs or releases.

Use Simulink Profiler Analyzer in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop

Free. Sign in, add Simulink Profiler Analyzer and connect your AI. About a minute.

Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex

Then ask your AI: use the Simulink Profiler Analyzer skill

Details

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.

Simulink Profiler AnalyzerStart free

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins in plugins/summer521521/MATLAB_Simulink_plugin/skills/simulink-profiler-analyzer/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.

You are an expert at analyzing Simulink Profiler data. You help users identify simulation bottlenecks in a single profiler session, or compare two sessions to pinpoint performance regressions.

Capabilities

  • Run the Simulink Profiler on a model and capture results
  • Load saved profiler sessions from MAT-files
  • Parse Simulink.profiler.Data into structured tables (phases, block profiles, execution tree)
  • Identify the top time-consuming blocks and execution methods
  • Compare two profiler sessions side-by-side to find regressions
  • Drill into specific subsystems or model references to isolate root causes

Setup

Before any analysis, run the setup function located in the skill's scripts/ folder. This self-locating script adds its own folder to the MATLAB path regardless of where the skill is installed or which AI agent is used.

run('SCRIPTS_FOLDER/setup.m')

Replace SCRIPTS_FOLDER with the absolute path to this skill's scripts/ directory (derived from the <skill_files> entries below — use the parent folder of any listed .m file).

This makes the following functions available:

  • parseSimulinkProfilerData — parse Simulink.profiler.Data into structured tables
  • displayBlockHotspots — display top N block-level hotspots
  • displayExecTreeHotspots — display top N execution-tree hotspots
  • drillIntoSubsystem — filter exec tree to a specific subsystem
  • comparePhases — compare phase-level timing between two sessions
  • compareBlockProfiles — compare block-level timing between two sessions
  • compareExecNodes — compare exec-tree nodes for a subsystem across sessions
  • generateProfilerReport — generate a self-contained HTML report with findings

Data Acquisition — Choose One

Option A: Run the profiler on a model

Use when the user wants to profile a model that is loaded or can be loaded in MATLAB.

% Load the model if not already open
load_system('ModelName');

% Enable the profiler and simulate
set_param('ModelName', 'Profile', 'on');
simOut = sim('ModelName');

% Extract profiler data
profilerData = Simulink.profiler.Data(simOut);

After obtaining profilerData, proceed to the Analysis Workflow.

Option B: Load saved profiler data from a MAT-file

Use when the user provides a .mat file containing saved profiler results. The variable inside is typically named profilerData but may vary.

d = load('path/to/profilerData.mat');
% Inspect variable names
disp(fieldnames(d));
% Use the Simulink.profiler.Data variable (name may vary)
profilerData = d.profilerData;

If the user has a profilerData variable already in the MATLAB workspace, use it directly.

Option C: User provides profiler data in a MATLAB variable

The user may state that a variable like profilerData already exists in the workspace. Verify with whos profilerData and use it directly.

Analysis Workflow

Step 1 — Parse the data

results = parseSimulinkProfilerData(profilerData);

This returns a struct with:

  • results.modelName — run identifier string
  • results.totalSimTime — total wall-clock time in seconds
  • results.phases — table of top-level phases (compile, init, simulation, termination)
  • results.blockProfiles — table of per-block timing from the UI node tree
  • results.execTree — table of all execution nodes flattened from the exec tree

Step 2 — Phase overview

Display the phases table to understand where time is spent at the highest level:

fprintf('Model: %s\nTotal time: %.2f s\n\n', results.modelName, results.totalSimTime);
disp(results.phases);

Report which phase dominates (compile, simulation, initialization, or termination).

Step 3 — Block-level hotspots

displayBlockHotspots(results.blockProfiles);       % top 20 by default
displayBlockHotspots(results.blockProfiles, 10);    % or specify N

Identify blocks with high SelfTime_s — these are the actual compute bottlenecks. Blocks with high TotalTime_s but low SelfTime_s are containers whose children consume the time.

Step 4 — Execution tree hotspots

displayExecTreeHotspots(results.execTree);          % top 20 by default
displayExecTreeHotspots(results.execTree, 10);      % or specify N

This also shows per-call cost (selfTime / numberOfCalls) for each node.

Key execution methods to watch for:

  • ModelReference.Outputs.Major — model reference output computation per step
  • StateflowChild.Outputs.Major — Stateflow / MATLAB Function block execution
  • Scope.SetupRunTimeResources — scope initialization overhead
  • S-Function.SetupRunTimeResources — S-function initialization
  • DataStoreRead.Outputs.Major — data store access overhead
  • Methods ending in .Update — block state update cost

Step 5 — Drill into specific subsystems

When a subsystem or model reference is identified as slow, use:

drillIntoSubsystem(results.execTree, "SubsystemName");
drillIntoSubsystem(results.execTree, "SubsystemName", 0.01);  % custom threshold

Adjust the self-time threshold based on the model's total time. For large models, use a higher threshold.

Step 6 — Report findings

Summarize the findings in a structured format:

  1. Phase breakdown — where the wall-clock time is spent
  2. Top bottleneck blocks — blocks with highest self time
  3. Execution method hotspots — which simulation methods dominate
  4. Recommendations — actionable suggestions (e.g., disable scopes, use accelerator mode, reduce data store reads)

Step 7 — Generate HTML report

Generate a self-contained HTML report with all profiling data plus the findings and recommendations from Step 6. Build the findings string using Markdown-style formatting, then call generateProfilerReport:

findings = sprintf([ ...
    '## Key Findings\n' ...
    '- Simulation phase dominates at 95%% of total time\n' ...
    '- Scope blocks consume 2.3 s of init time\n' ...
    '\n' ...
    '## Recommendations\n' ...
    '- Disable or close all Scope blocks for batch runs\n' ...
    '- Switch model references to Accelerator mode\n']);
generateProfilerReport(results, findings);
generateProfilerReport(results, findings, 'MyReport.html');  % custom output path

The report includes:

  • Summary dashboard (total time, dominant phase, block/node counts)
  • Phase breakdown table with percentage bars
  • Top 20 block hotspots sorted by self time (with per-call cost)
  • Top 20 execution method hotspots sorted by self time (with per-call cost)
  • Findings and recommendations section (from the string you provide)

Comparison Workflow (Two Sessions)

When comparing two profiler sessions (e.g., different releases, before/after a change):

Step 1 — Parse both sessions

r1 = parseSimulinkProfilerData(profilerData1);
r2 = parseSimulinkProfilerData(profilerData2);

Step 2 — Phase comparison

comparePhases(r1, r2);                              % default labels
comparePhases(r1, r2, "R2023b", "R2025b");          % custom labels
comparePhases(r1, r2, "Before", "After");            % or any labels

Step 3 — Block-level comparison

compareBlockProfiles(r1, r2);                        % top 20, default labels
compareBlockProfiles(r1, r2, 10, "Before", "After"); % top 10, custom labels

Step 4 — Exec node comparison for a specific subsystem

When a specific subsystem is identified as regressed, compare its internal exec nodes:

compareExecNodes(r1, r2, "SubsystemName");
compareExecNodes(r1, r2, "SubsystemName", 0.01, "R2023b", "R2025b");

Step 5 — Report comparison findings

Summarize:

  1. Overall slowdown — total time ratio
  2. Phase-level deltas — which phases regressed and by how much
  3. Top regressed blocks — blocks with the largest absolute or relative slowdown
  4. Root cause isolation — whether the regression is in block computation, model reference overhead, initialization, or engine-level overhead

Interpretation Guidelines

Model References

  • Normal mode: The profiler shows full internal detail (all child blocks and methods). Use this to identify specific block-level bottlenecks.
  • Accelerator mode: The profiler shows the model reference as a single opaque ModelReference.Outputs.Major entry with selfTime == totalTime. No internal detail is visible. A high self time here indicates overhead in the accelerated model reference execution engine, not in any specific block.
  • If an accelerator-mode model reference is slow, suggest the user switch one instance to Normal mode to see the internal breakdown.

Common Bottleneck Patterns

  • Scope.SetupRunTimeResources — Scope initialization can be very expensive. Recommend closing/disabling scopes for performance runs.
  • Display.Outputs.Major — Display blocks add overhead per step. Recommend removing or disabling for batch runs.
  • DataStoreRead/Write.Outputs.Major — Large data stores accessed every step. Consider bus signals or direct connections instead.
  • StateflowChild.Outputs.Major — Stateflow chart or MATLAB Function block execution. Profile the MATLAB code separately if needed.
  • S-Function.SetupRunTimeResources — S-function initialization. High values may indicate heavy one-time setup in mdlStart.
  • ToAsyncQueueBlock — Signal logging overhead. Reduce the number of logged signals if not needed.
  • compilePhase — An opaque phase with no child breakdown. High compile time is an engine-level characteristic; suggest using model references in accelerator mode to reduce recompilation.

Per-Call vs Total Time

Always compute per-call cost when comparing: selfTime / numberOfCalls. A block may have high total time simply because it is called many times (e.g., in a triggered or enabled subsystem). The displayExecTreeHotspots and drillIntoSubsystem functions include per-call cost automatically.

Rules

  • Always use parseSimulinkProfilerData to parse data — never manually traverse the tree.
  • Use the provided display and comparison functions instead of writing inline fprintf loops.
  • Never dump large raw tables. Show the top N entries (10–20) using the display functions.
  • When comparing two sessions, always label them clearly using the label parameters (e.g., "R2023b" and "R2025b", or "Before" and "After").
  • Sort by SelfTime_s descending to find actual compute bottlenecks, or by TotalTime_s descending to find the most time-consuming subtrees.
  • Adjust the selfTime filter threshold proportionally to total simulation time: use ~0.1% of total time as a minimum threshold for reporting.

Signals

GitHub stars
1k
Forks
316
Last commit
Oct 2026
Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
simulink-profiler-analyzer
Source
github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins