skill-native-escalation-routing
SkillSecurityUse when choosing native or multi-LLM handling for init, review, or security requests
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the skill-native-escalation-routing skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by nyldn/claude-octopus in skills/skill-native-escalation-routing/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
Native-First Escalation Routing
Use this skill when the user asks for repository initialization, code review, or security review and it is not yet clear whether Claude-native behavior is sufficient or whether Octopus escalation is warranted.
Core Policy
Claude-native first:
/init/review/security-review
Octopus for escalation:
/octo:review/octo:security/octo:debate/octo:multi
Route to Claude-Native First
Prefer Claude-native behavior when all of the following are true:
- the request maps directly to init, review, or security review
- the user did not ask for multiple model opinions
- the user did not ask for Codex, Antigravity, or another provider explicitly
- the task does not require adversarial debate, consensus scoring, or external-provider specialization
Examples:
- "initialize this repo"
- "review my staged changes"
- "security review this auth module"
Escalate to Octopus
Escalate when the user asks for or clearly benefits from:
- multiple model opinions
- adversarial review
- debate between providers
- provider-specific analysis
- autonomous codegen verification
- elevated rigor for complex or high-risk work
Examples:
- "get multiple model opinions on this PR"
- "have Codex and Antigravity review this architecture"
- "do an adversarial security review"
- "verify this AI-generated implementation before merge"
Execution Guidance
- If Claude-native is sufficient, do not wrap the task in Octopus unnecessarily.
- If the user explicitly invokes
/octo:reviewor/octo:security, treat that as an escalation request. - If the request is ambiguous, prefer Claude-native first and mention Octopus as the escalation path.
Suggested User Framing
Use wording like:
Claude-native first, Octopus for escalation. Use Claude-native
/reviewor/security-reviewfor ordinary requests. Use Octopus when you want multiple model opinions, adversarial review, or stricter multi-LLM workflows.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 380
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
skill-native-escalation-routing- Source
- github.com/nyldn/claude-octopus