/task — Create a Technical Task Ticket

Creates a structured GitHub Issue for a technical task with driver (why), scope (what), acceptance criteria, and risks. Used for tech debt, infrastructure, refactoring, dependency updates, or any non-user-facing work that doesn't fit /feature or /bug.

Path resolution

Read the registry path via portfolio_registry, the per-project docs dir via portfolio_projects_dir, and the ideas backlog via portfolio_ideas_backlog — all from .claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh. Source the helper at the top of any bash block that touches those paths:

source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
registry=$(portfolio_registry)

Defaults match today's single-fork layout (./apexyard.projects.yaml, ./projects, ./projects/ideas-backlog.md). Adopters in split-portfolio mode override the portfolio.{registry, projects_dir, ideas_backlog} keys in .claude/project-config.json. Don't hardcode literal apexyard.projects.yaml or projects/ paths in bash blocks — the helper resolves whichever mode the adopter is in. See docs/multi-project.md.

Usage

/task Set up PR-triggered CI pipeline
/task Extract shared LikeCount component
/task Migrate from DiceBear to local avatars

Process

0. Write the active-issue-skill marker (REQUIRED — me2resh/apexyard#268)

Before any gh issue create (or other tracker CLI), write this skill's name to the active-issue-skill marker so require-skill-for-issue-create.sh lets the command through. At skill entry:

# Resolve the ops-fork root the SAME way the hooks do (_lib-ops-root.sh):
# anchor on the .apexyard-fork marker (split-portfolio v2 — onboarding.yaml
# lives in the sibling portfolio repo, NOT the ops fork), falling back to the
# onboarding.yaml + apexyard.projects.yaml pair (single-fork v1).
ops_root="$PWD"; r="$PWD"
while [ "$r" != / ]; do
  if [ -f "$r/.apexyard-fork" ] || { [ -f "$r/onboarding.yaml" ] && [ -f "$r/apexyard.projects.yaml" ]; }; then
    ops_root="$r"; break
  fi
  r=${r%/*}
done
mkdir -p "$ops_root/.claude/session"
echo "task" > "$ops_root/.claude/session/active-issue-skill"

Remove the marker on every exit path (success, early-exit, user cancel, error):

rm -f "$ops_root/.claude/session/active-issue-skill"

The clear-issue-skill-marker.sh SessionStart hook sweeps stale markers from killed sessions, but a clean exit should never leave one behind. See AgDR-0030.

1. Resolve the target repo

Read .claude/session/current-ticket to determine which repo we're working in. If no active ticket, check apexyard.projects.yaml for managed projects. If only one project, use it. If multiple, ask:

Which project is this task for?

If no projects are registered, ask for the repo in owner/repo format.

2. Parse or ask for the title

Take the title from $ARGUMENTS. If empty, ask:

What's the task? Give me a short title.

3. Gather details (one question at a time)

Ask conversationally — do NOT batch all questions. Wait for each answer before asking the next.

a) Driver

Why is this work needed? (upstream ticket, tech debt rationale, Rex recommendation, dependency requirement, etc.)

b) Scope

What specifically needs to change? Be concrete — which files, services, or systems are affected.

c) Acceptance Criteria

What are the acceptance criteria? What must be true when this is done?

d) Priority

Priority?
1. P0 — blocks other work
2. P1 — important, schedule soon
3. P2 — nice to have, do when convenient

e) Risks / Dependencies (optional)

Any risks or dependencies? (what could block this, what depends on it, or Enter to skip)

4. Resolve the task body template

Resolve the task body template via the portfolio helper so adopter overrides win when present:

source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
template=$(portfolio_resolve_template tickets/task.md)   # → custom-templates/tickets/task.md if present, else templates/tickets/task.md

Single-fork adopters (no portfolio block) and adopters with no override fall straight through to templates/tickets/task.md. Adopters who want a customised task-body shape drop their version at <private_repo>/custom-templates/tickets/task.md. See templates/README.md for the path-mirroring convention.

Backward-compat fallback: if portfolio_resolve_template returns empty (template file missing — partial adopter setup), fall back to the inline heredoc body below and print a one-line WARN on stderr (WARN: tickets/task.md template missing — using inline fallback).

5. Show the formatted ticket for confirmation

Substitute the gathered inputs into the resolved template (or the inline heredoc fallback), then display the full ticket using the resolved shape (the default templates/tickets/task.md shape is reproduced below):

Here's the ticket I'll create:

---
**[{Chore|Refactor|Testing|CI}] {title}**

## Driver
{why this work is needed}

## Scope
{what specifically needs to change}

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {criterion 1}
- [ ] {criterion 2}
- [ ] ...

## Risks / Dependencies
{risks or "None identified"}

## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| {term} | {definition} |
---

Labels: {type}, {P0|P1|P2}
Repo: {owner/repo}

Create this ticket? (yes / edit / cancel)

The title prefix is derived from the content, and must come from the project's configured prefix whitelist (.claude/project-config.*.json → .ticket.prefix_whitelist, default list at .claude/project-config.defaults.json). Shipped defaults map as follows:

• Testing work → [Testing]
• CI/CD work → [CI]
• Refactoring → [Refactor]
• Documentation-only change → [Docs]
• Everything else → [Chore]

A fork that extends the whitelist (e.g. adds [Security], [Perf], [Scaffold]) automatically gains the option here — the skill reads the live config, it does not hardcode the list. See apexyard#109 for the schema and how to extend.

6. Handle response

• yes / looks good / go → create the issue
• edit / change X → ask what to change, update, re-show
• cancel / no → abort

7. Create the issue (via the tracker abstraction)

Dispatch creation through tracker_create (#670 / AgDR-0072) so the issue lands in this project's tracker — GitHub, GitLab, or a custom CLI — per its tracker: block in apexyard.projects.yaml. For a GitHub adopter this runs gh issue create exactly as before; no behaviour change.

# Resolve the tracker lib (it lives in the ops fork's hooks dir) by walking up
# from the cwd; source it.
tracker_lib="$(r="$PWD"; while [ -n "$r" ] && [ "$r" != / ]; do \
  [ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh" ] && { echo "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh"; break; }; \
  r="${r%/*}"; done)"
# shellcheck source=/dev/null
. "$tracker_lib"

# Pass the body via a file (arbitrary markdown — never inline-interpolated).
body_file="$(mktemp)"
cat > "$body_file" <<'BODY'
{formatted body}
BODY

# tracker_create <owner/repo> <title> <body_file> [<labels_csv>] → {"ref","url"}.
# It is gated by require-skill-for-issue-create.sh; the active-issue-skill
# marker written in step 0 keeps this call allowed.
result="$(tracker_create "{owner/repo}" "[{type}] {title}" "$body_file" "{priority}")"
rc=$?
rm -f "$body_file"
if [ "$rc" -eq 3 ]; then
  # tracker.kind=none (shape-only): no tracker to create in. tracker_create
  # printed the rendered ticket body to stdout — surface it for manual /
  # external filing instead of a non-existent CLI/auth failure.
  echo "Tracker is 'none' (shape-only) — nothing was created in a tracker." >&2
  echo "File this in your external system (e.g. Jira/Linear via MCP):" >&2
  printf '%s\n' "$result"
  exit 0
elif [ "$rc" -ne 0 ] || [ -z "$result" ]; then
  echo "Ticket creation failed — check the tracker CLI / auth. Nothing was created." >&2
  exit 1
fi

8. Return the result

Parse the normalised {ref, url} from tracker_create:

ref="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.ref')"
url="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.url')"
echo "Created: {owner/repo}#${ref} — {title}"
echo "${url}"

Rules

1. One question at a time. Never batch questions. Wait for each answer.
2. Always confirm before creating. Show the full ticket and get explicit "yes".
3. Driver is required. Every technical task needs a "why".
4. At least one acceptance criterion. Don't create tasks with empty ACs.
5. Labels auto-applied. Priority label always applied.
6. Title prefix. Derived from the nature of the work: Testing, CI, Refactor, or Chore.

---

Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.