Test-Driven Development (TDD) Workflow
SkillAI & modelsTest-Driven Development workflow enforcement with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. Use when implementing features test-first or improving test coverage.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Test-Driven Development (TDD) Workflow skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by travisjneuman/.claude in skills/tdd-workflow/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
A disciplined approach to development where tests drive design and implementation.
The TDD Mantra
"Never write a line of code without a failing test."
The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
RED Phase: Write a Failing Test
Goal: Define the expected behavior BEFORE implementation.
Rules:
- Write the smallest test that fails
- Test must fail for the RIGHT reason
- Test should clearly express intent
- Don't write implementation yet
Example:
// RED: Test the behavior we want
describe("Calculator", () => {
it("should add two numbers", () => {
const calc = new Calculator();
expect(calc.add(2, 3)).toBe(5);
});
});
// Run: npm test
// Result: FAIL - Calculator is not defined
// This is RED ✓
Checklist:
- Test is written
- Test fails when run
- Failure message is clear
- Test name describes expected behavior
GREEN Phase: Make the Test Pass
Goal: Write the MINIMUM code to pass the test.
Rules:
- Do the simplest thing that works
- Don't add extra features
- Don't optimize
- Just make it green
Example:
// GREEN: Minimum implementation to pass
class Calculator {
add(a: number, b: number): number {
return a + b; // Simplest thing that works
}
}
// Run: npm test
// Result: PASS
// This is GREEN ✓
Checklist:
- Test passes
- No extra code added
- Implementation is minimal
REFACTOR Phase: Improve the Code
Goal: Clean up while keeping tests green.
Rules:
- Only refactor with passing tests
- Run tests after each change
- Improve design, not behavior
- Small, incremental changes
Examples of refactoring:
- Extract methods
- Rename for clarity
- Remove duplication
- Improve performance
- Add types/documentation
Checklist:
- Tests still pass
- Code is cleaner
- No behavior changed
- Ready for next RED
TDD in Practice
Starting a New Feature
1. Write high-level acceptance test (may not run yet)
2. Write first unit test (RED)
3. Implement minimum code (GREEN)
4. Refactor if needed (REFACTOR)
5. Repeat 2-4 until feature complete
6. Verify acceptance test passes
Test Structure (AAA Pattern)
it("should [behavior] when [condition]", () => {
// Arrange - Set up test data and dependencies
const user = createTestUser({ role: "admin" });
const service = new UserService();
// Act - Execute the code under test
const result = service.getPermissions(user);
// Assert - Verify expected outcomes
expect(result).toContain("delete");
expect(result).toContain("edit");
});
Test Naming Convention
[Unit]_[Scenario]_[ExpectedResult]
Examples:
add_withPositiveNumbers_returnsSumlogin_withInvalidPassword_throwsAuthErrorgetUser_whenNotFound_returnsNull
Test Categories
Unit Tests
- Single function/class in isolation
- Mock all dependencies
- Fast (<10ms per test)
- Run constantly during development
Integration Tests
- Multiple components together
- Real database (test instance)
- Slower but more realistic
- Run before commits
End-to-End Tests
- Full system through UI
- Slowest, most realistic
- Run in CI/CD pipeline
- Cover critical user paths
TDD Best Practices
DO:
- Start with the simplest case
- Write one test at a time
- Keep tests independent
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Use descriptive test names
- Commit after each green
DON'T:
- Write code before tests
- Test private methods directly
- Test framework code
- Overfit tests to implementation
- Skip the refactor phase
Edge Cases to Test
Always test:
- Empty inputs (null, undefined, [], {}, '')
- Boundary values (0, -1, MAX_INT, min/max dates)
- Error conditions (network fail, invalid input)
- Permission boundaries
- Concurrent access
- Unicode/special characters
Test Coverage Guidelines
| Metric | Minimum | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Statements | 70% | 85% |
| Branches | 70% | 80% |
| Functions | 80% | 90% |
| Lines | 70% | 85% |
Coverage is a metric, not a goal. 100% coverage doesn't mean bug-free.
Quick Reference
RED → Write failing test (define behavior)
GREEN → Minimum code to pass (make it work)
REFACTOR → Clean up (make it right)
COMMIT → Save progress (make it permanent)
Common TDD Mistakes
| Mistake | Problem | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Testing implementation | Brittle tests | Test behavior/outcomes |
| Tests too large | Hard to debug | Smaller, focused tests |
| Shared state | Flaky tests | Isolate each test |
| Slow tests | Skipped tests | Mock external deps |
| Testing obvious code | Wasted time | Focus on logic |
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 97
- Forks
- 22
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
tdd-workflow-travisjneuman- Source
- github.com/travisjneuman/.claude