Literature Deep Research
SkillDev toolsLets your agent search PubMed and other paper databases, grade the evidence, and write cited research reports.
Then ask your AI: use the Literature Deep Research skill
Details
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; Ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
No other account needed.
Add it as a step in a pipeline you build on Ahel, or connect Ahel to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex and ask your AI to use it.
About this skill
Deep literature review, PubMed, EuropePMC, bioRxiv preprints, citation networks, evidence synthesis. Disambiguates queries, runs collision-aware searches, grades evidence T1-T4, and produces structured reports. Use for systematic literature review, meta-analysis evidence collection, and detailed an
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by mims-harvard/tooluniverse in skills/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.
Systematic literature research: disambiguate, search with collision-aware queries, grade evidence, produce structured reports.
KEY PRINCIPLES: (1) Disambiguate first (2) Right-size deliverable (3) Grade every claim T1-T4 (4) All sections mandatory even if "limited evidence" (5) Source attribution for every claim (6) English-first queries, respond in user's language (7) Report = deliverable, not search log
LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
Search PubMed/EuropePMC FIRST before reasoning. A published paper beats memory.
Factoid search strategy:
- Extract KEY TERMS (most specific nouns/verbs)
EuropePMC_search_articles(query="term1 term2 term3", limit=5)- No results -> BROADEN (remove most restrictive term)
- Too many -> NARROW (add specific terms)
- Answer usually in abstract of top results
- Failed query -> try DIFFERENT TERMS/synonyms, don't repeat
COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
Workflow
Phase 0: Clarify + Mode Select → Phase 1: Disambiguate + Profile → Phase 2: Literature Search → Phase 3: Report
Phase 0: Mode Selection
| Mode | When | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Factoid | Single concrete question | 1-page fact-check report + bibliography |
| Mini-review | Narrow topic | 1-3 page narrative |
| Full Deep-Research | Comprehensive overview | 15-section report + bibliography |
Factoid Mode (Fast Path)
# [TOPIC]: Fact-check Report
## Question / ## Answer (with evidence rating) / ## Source(s) / ## Verification Notes / ## Limitations
Domain Detection
| Pattern | Domain | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Gene/protein symbol | Biological target | Full bio disambiguation |
| Drug name | Drug | Drug disambiguation (1.5) |
| Disease name | Disease | Disease disambiguation (1.6) |
| CS/ML topic | General academic | Skip bio tools, literature-only |
| Cross-domain | Interdisciplinary | Resolve each entity in its domain |
Cross-Skill Delegation
- Gene/protein deep-dive:
tooluniverse-target-research - Drug profile:
tooluniverse-drug-research - Disease profile:
tooluniverse-disease-research
Use this skill for literature synthesis. Use specialized skills for entity profiling. For max depth, run both.
Phase 1: Subject Disambiguation + Profile
1.1 Biological Target Resolution
UniProt_search → UniProt_get_entry_by_accession → UniProt_id_mapping
ensembl_lookup_gene → MyGene_get_gene_annotation
1.2 Naming Collision Detection
Check first 20 results. If >20% off-topic, build negative filter: NOT [collision1] NOT [collision2].
Gene family: "ADAR" NOT "ADAR2" NOT "ADARB1". Cross-domain: add context terms.
1.3 Baseline Profile (Bio Targets)
InterPro_get_protein_domains, UniProt_get_ptm_processing_by_accession, HPA_get_subcellular_location,
GTEx_get_median_gene_expression, GO_get_annotations_for_gene, Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways,
STRING_get_protein_interactions, intact_get_interactions, OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID
GPCR targets: delegate to tooluniverse-target-research.
1.5 Drug Disambiguation
Identity: OpenTargets_get_drug_chembId_by_generic_name, ChEMBL_get_drug, PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name, drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id
Targets: ChEMBL_get_drug_mechanisms, OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_drug_chemblId, DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions
Safety: OpenTargets_get_drug_adverse_events_by_chemblId, OpenTargets_get_drug_indications_by_chemblId, search_clinical_trials
1.6 Disease Disambiguation
OpenTargets disease search → EFO/MONDO IDs
DisGeNET_get_disease_genes, DisGeNET_search_disease
CTD_get_disease_chemicals
1.7 Compound Queries (e.g., "metformin in breast cancer")
Resolve both entities, then cross-reference via CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions, CTD_get_chemical_diseases, OpenTargets drug-target/drug-disease tools. Intersect shared targets/pathways.
1.8 General Academic / 1.9 Interdisciplinary
Non-bio: skip bio tools, use ArXiv/DBLP/OSF. Cross-domain: resolve bio entities with 1.1-1.3, search CS/general in parallel, merge and cross-reference.
Phase 2: Literature Search
Methodology stays internal. Report shows findings, not process.
2.1 Query Strategy
Step 1: Seeds (15-30 core papers): domain-specific title searches with date/sort filters.
Step 2: Citation expansion: PubMed_get_cited_by, EuropePMC_get_citations/references, PubMed_get_related, SemanticScholar_get_recommendations, OpenCitations_get_citations. If the opt-in Noodle MCP is connected (noodle_*, needs NOODLE_MCP_URL), its bounded citation/semantic graph traversal is another angle on the same PubMed corpus -- a discovery signal, not evidence of causality or validity, same caveat as the others.
Step 3: Collision-filtered broader queries: "[TERM]" AND ([context]) NOT [collision]
2.2 Literature Tools — core set + adaptive by domain
Run the core multi-field set on every review (catches what any single index misses), then add the domain rows that match the subject. Don't fire every source blindly — 6–10 well-chosen indexes beat 20 noisy ones.
ALWAYS run (core, all disciplines): PubMed_search_articles, EuropePMC_search_articles, openalex_search_works (query param search/query) or openalex_literature_search (query param search_keywords) — pick one and match its param; mixing them silently returns off-topic results — and SemanticScholar_search_papers
Then add by domain:
| Domain | Add these | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Biomedical / clinical | PMC_search_papers (full text), PubTator3_LiteratureSearch (entity & relations: queries), PubMed_Guidelines_Search (clinical guidelines) | PubTator normalizes gene/drug/disease entities |
| Biology (ecology/evolution/plant) | EuropePMC as PRIMARY + OpenAlex | PubMed returns 0–1 for non-clinical biology |
| CS / ML / AI | ArXiv_search_papers, DBLP_search_publications | arXiv + CS bibliography |
| Physics / HEP / astro | InspireHEP_search_papers | 1.6M+ particle/astro records |
| Broad / hard-to-find / OA | Crossref_search_works, CORE_search_papers, DOAJ_search_articles, Fatcat_search_scholar, Consensus_search_papers | DOI registry + OA aggregators + Internet Archive Scholar; Consensus (220M+ papers) adds an AI takeaway + study-design metadata per paper -- useful for fast triage, not a substitute for reading the source |
| Regional / EU-funded | OpenAIRE_search_publications, HAL_search_archive | EU open science + French national archive |
| Datasets / software / outputs | Figshare_search_articles, Zenodo_search_records | Citable DOIs for data & code |
| Preprints (latest) | EuropePMC_search_articles(source='PPR'), OSF_search_preprints, BioRxiv_get_preprint/MedRxiv_get_preprint (DOI lookup) | bioRxiv/medRxiv/PsyArXiv etc. |
Multi-source: advanced_literature_search_agent (12+ DBs; needs Azure key -- fallback: query the core set individually).
Citation impact: iCite_search_publications (RCR/APT), iCite_get_publications (by PMID), scite_get_tallies (support/contradict). PubMed-only; for CS use SemanticScholar.
Identifiers and reference lists: PubMed_convert_article_ids {"ids": ["23193287", "10.1093/nar/gks1195"]} converts between PMID, PMCID and DOI (auto-detected; only articles in PubMed Central convert, others return found: false) -- use it to turn a DOI into the PMCID that EuropePMC_get_full_text needs. PubMed_lookup_article_by_citation {"journal": "Nature", "year": 2015, "volume": 521, "first_page": 436, "author": "lecun y"} resolves a reference-list entry to a PMID (status: found / ambiguous / not_found; pass citations for a batch). The match is exact on the fields given, so an unfound citation is a signal to re-check the fields, not proof the paper is missing.
A domain-specific index returning 0 (e.g. ArXiv on a pure-clinical topic) is normal — only worry if the whole core set is empty.
2.3-2.4 Full-Text & PubMed Zero-Result Fallback
Full-text: see FULLTEXT_STRATEGY.md for three-tier strategy.
CRITICAL: PubMed returns 0 for ~30% of valid queries. Always retry with EuropePMC when PubMed returns empty. This is not optional.
2.5 Tool Failure / OA Handling
Retry once -> fallback tool. Key fallbacks: PubMed_get_cited_by -> EuropePMC_get_citations -> OpenCitations. OA: Unpaywall if configured, else Europe PMC/PMC/OpenAlex flags.
Last resort when every structured index above is empty (a brand-new preprint, a dataset page, a project site with no DOI): the opt-in exa_* tools (general neural web search, no key needed for casual use) can still find it, but it's general internet retrieval, not a scientific database -- verify anything it surfaces against a real source before citing, don't grade it T1-T4 as if it were literature.
2.6 Controlled Vocabulary, Text-Mined Annotations, Citation Cross-References, and Variant Literature
Four small tool families beyond core search/citation coverage — verified live, not schema-assumed:
MeSH (controlled vocabulary): MeSH_search_descriptors/MeSH_search_terms resolve a free-text term to NLM's standardized MeSH descriptor/entry-term IDs; MeSH_get_descriptor returns the descriptor's official label, type, and annotation. Use to broaden or standardize a query before searching (e.g. a user says "sugar disease" -> MeSH_search_terms finds the descriptor is actually filed under "Diabetes Mellitus") or to confirm two different-sounding search hits are actually indexed under the same concept.
EuroPMCAnnot (text-mined entity annotations): EuroPMCAnnot_get_article_annotations (all entity mentions in one article: genes, diseases, chemicals, organisms, etc.), EuroPMCAnnot_get_chemicals_from_article (chemical/compound mentions only, a filtered convenience view), EuroPMCAnnot_get_annotations_by_type (one annotation type across multiple articles at once). These extract what a paper mentions without you reading the full text — useful for a fast relevance check across many candidate papers, or for confirming a specific gene/chemical is actually discussed (not just present in an abstract keyword match). Live-verified example: EuroPMCAnnot_get_chemicals_from_article on PMC4353746 returned 19 real chemical mentions including "Resistin".
Citation cross-references — naming collision, read carefully: src/tooluniverse/data/europepmc_citations_tools.json defines EPMC_get_citations, EPMC_get_references, and EuropePMC_get_article_datalinks — do NOT confuse these with the already-documented EuropePMC_get_citations/EuropePMC_get_references (core europe_pmc_tools.json, used above in Phase 2.1/TOOL_NAMES_REFERENCE.md). They are separate implementations with near-identical names hitting the same underlying Europe PMC REST endpoints. Live-verified as of this writing: the /references endpoint is down on BOTH implementations (EPMC_get_references and EuropePMC_get_references both return a real 503 "This API is temporarily unavailable due to maintenance" from www.ebi.ac.uk), and EuropePMC_get_article_datalinks independently confirmed broken via direct curl (33s response, HTTP 500). EPMC_get_citations/EuropePMC_get_citations (the forward-citation direction) both work normally. Practical guidance: prefer the already-documented EuropePMC_get_citations/EuropePMC_get_references names for citation work; if references-fetching fails with a 503, it is very likely this live outage, not a query problem — say so rather than reporting "no references found." EuropePMC_get_article_datalinks (when working) additionally surfaces what data/database records a paper deposited (GenBank accessions, PDB entries, clinical trial registrations) — complementary to, not a replacement for, citations/references.
Document conversion (any format to markdown): convert_to_markdown {"uri": "..."} accepts an http:/https:/file:/data: URI and converts it to markdown — verified live on an HTML page. Reach for this when a source is a PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, or HTML page rather than something the literature tools above already return as structured JSON (e.g. a supplementary-materials file, an institutional report, a non-indexed working paper someone hands you a link to) and you need its actual text content, not just metadata. This is a generic conversion utility, not a literature-search tool — use PubMed/EuropePMC/OpenAlex above whenever the source is already indexed there.
BGPT (structured critical-appraisal search): BGPT_search_paper_evidence is a literature search tool, not a generative model despite the name — live-verified, it returns real papers (doi, title, plus full-text-derived fields). Unlike PubMed/EuropePMC/OpenAlex (title+abstract only), each result also includes methods/techniques used, sample size and population, results, paper limitations and biases, conflicts of interest, data/code availability, and a how_to_falsify statement — reach for it when a claim needs quality-weighing (is this an RCT with n=12 or n=12,000? does the paper disclose a conflict of interest?) rather than just a citation. Caveat: these structured fields are model-generated summaries of the paper, not curated ground truth — treat them as an appraisal aid and still verify against the actual paper before citing a specific number from them. First 50 results/session are free; BGPT_API_KEY unlocks the paid tier after that.
LitVar (literature-derived variant mentions): LitVar_search_variants (find variants by rsID/gene/HGVS as discussed in the literature), LitVar_get_variant_publications (PMIDs mentioning a specific variant), LitVar_get_variant_details (structured record: gene, HGVS, ClinGen IDs). This answers "what does the literature say has been written about variant X" — distinct from clinical variant-classification databases (ClinVar, gnomAD, already in Phase 1.1/TOOL_NAMES_REFERENCE.md), which answer "what is variant X's clinical significance." Use LitVar to find the papers, then a clinical database to grade the variant itself. Live-verified: LitVar_search_variants(gene="BRCA1") and rsID-based lookups (rs328, rs7903146) all returned real hits; LitVar_get_variant_publications returned real PMID lists per variant.
Phase 3: Evidence Grading
| Tier | Label | Bio Example | CS/ML Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Mechanistic | CRISPR KO + rescue, RCT | Formal proof, controlled ablation |
| T2 | Functional | siRNA knockdown phenotype | Benchmark with baselines |
| T3 | Association | GWAS, screen hit | Observational, case study |
| T4 | Mention | Review article | Survey, workshop abstract |
Inline: Target X regulates Y [T1: PMID:12345678]. Per theme: summarize evidence distribution.
Triaging a large candidate set before reading in full: Consensus_search_papers returns study type and sample size per paper, a fast first pass for provisional tiering -- confirm against the actual paper before citing, its metadata is a starting point, not the grade itself.
Report Output
| File | Mode |
|---|---|
[topic]_report.md | Full |
[topic]_factcheck_report.md | Factoid |
[topic]_bibliography.json + .csv | All |
Progressive update: create report with all section headers immediately. Fill after each phase. Write Executive Summary LAST.
Use 15-section template from REPORT_TEMPLATE.md. Domain adaptations: bio (architecture/expression/GO/disease), drug (properties/MOA/PK/safety), disease (epi/patho/genes/treatments), general (history/theories/evidence/applications).
Communication
Brief progress updates only: "Resolving identifiers...", "Building paper set...", "Grading evidence..." Do NOT expose: raw tool outputs, dedup counts, search round details.
References
TOOL_NAMES_REFERENCE.md-- 130+ tools with parametersREPORT_TEMPLATE.md-- template, domain adaptations, bibliography, completeness checklistFULLTEXT_STRATEGY.md-- three-tier full-text verificationWORKFLOW.md-- compact cheat-sheetEXAMPLES.md-- worked examples
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 2k
- Forks
- 261
- Last commit
- Oct 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
tooluniverse-literature-deep-research-mims-harvard- Source
- github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse
github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse
Related picks
Skill · sickn33
The pick for Pythonpython-design-patterns
Skill · wshobson
The pick for Pythonpandas-pro
Skill · jeffallan
The pick for Pandaspandas-dataframe-analyzer
Skill · a5c-ai
The pick for Pandasxlsx
Skill · anthropics
The pick for Excelexcel-dcf-modeler
Skill · jeremylongshore
The pick for Excel