Using Loopkit
SkillDev toolsUse when starting any conversation in a loopkit-enabled project - establishes how to find and use loopkit's 49 skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Using Loopkit skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by archive228/loopkit in skills/using-loopkit/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
IF A SKILL APPLIES, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This overrides "just answer quickly" instincts. Not negotiable.
The Rule
Invoke relevant skills BEFORE any response or action — including clarifying questions, exploring the codebase, or reading files. If it turns out wrong for the situation, drop it.
Then announce "Using [skill] to [purpose]" and follow the skill exactly. If it has a checklist, create a todo per item.
Where the skills live
Skills are files at .claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md. Each has YAML frontmatter with name and description (the description is a trigger phrase, not a summary). Load a skill by reading its SKILL.md when its trigger matches your task.
Skill routing (49 skills, 10 tracks)
| Task shape | First skill |
|---|---|
| "Fix this bug" / test failing / crash | systematic-debugging, then read-the-trace |
| "It broke between two commits" | bisect-regression |
| "Flaky test" | flaky-hunter |
| "Add a feature" / write anything new | spec-first, then write-failing-test-first |
| "Refactor" / dead code / deep nesting | kill-dead-code, simplify, reduce-nesting |
| About to claim done / commit / open PR | adversarial-verify + verification-before-completion + self-eval-bias |
| Review a diff | adversarial-verify, pr-from-diff |
| Frontend / UI work | design-system, a11y-pass, loading-empty-error-states |
| Security touch | owasp-review, authz-check, input-validation, secret-scan, dependency-audit |
| Data / SQL / migrations | sql-review, migration-writer, schema-diff |
| Docs / changelog / README | changelog-from-diff, decision-record, readme-audit |
| Git ops | clean-commits, pr-from-diff, rebase-safely, revert-surgical |
| Test suite gaps | coverage-gaps, contract-test |
| Running out of context | context-budget, tool-restraint |
| Parallel work | subagent-fanout |
| Starting a fresh project / major feature | planner-spec-expand, then feature-list-json, then init-script-contract |
| Bootstrapping into an existing multi-session project | progress-reading-protocol |
| Entering an implementation sprint | sprint-contract |
| Calibrating a reviewer / evaluator | evaluator-calibration |
| New Claude/Sonnet/Opus model landed | harness-stripping |
Full list: ls .claude/skills/.
Red Flags — STOP and check for a skill
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check first. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read the current SKILL.md. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "Tests pass, we're good" | verification-before-completion says: run the exact command, read the output, then claim. |
| "I'll do both features while I'm in here" | single-feature-discipline says: one per session. Never two. |
| "The reviewer will let this slide" | self-eval-bias says: assume it will confidently praise. Calibrate first. |
Priority when multiple skills apply
Process skills first (spec-first, systematic-debugging, planner-spec-expand, sprint-contract), then implementation skills (design-system, sql-review, etc.), then finishers (adversarial-verify, verification-before-completion, self-eval-bias, clean-commits).
- "Let's build X" →
planner-spec-expand→feature-list-json→sprint-contract→ domain skills →adversarial-verify. - "Fix bug Y" →
systematic-debugging→read-the-trace→ fix →verification-before-completion. - "Session open in existing project" →
progress-reading-protocol→sprint-contract→ work.
Skill release convention
Every new skill in loopkit ships as a folder with four required files. No exceptions — a skill without these is a draft, not a release.
skills/<skill-name>/
SKILL.md # the skill itself (frontmatter + procedure)
POST.md # ~200-word X-thread-shaped explainer
evidence/
before.md # verbatim transcript WITHOUT the skill loaded
after.md # same prompt WITH the skill loaded
SKILL.md— routed on its frontmatterdescription. Body under ~150 lines.POST.md— the announcement thread. Copy fromtemplate/POST.md, fill in every placeholder before publishing.evidence/before.md+evidence/after.md— one real task, both transcripts. The before/after pair is the receipt that the skill actually changes behaviour. If you cannot produce it, the skill is not ready; land it as a draft and merge once the evidence is real.
Bootstrap a new skill by copying template/ verbatim:
cp -r template skills/<skill-name>
Then edit SKILL.md, write POST.md, and capture the before/after pair.
User instructions win
CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and direct user requests override loopkit skills. Only skip a skill workflow when the user has explicitly said to.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 754
- Forks
- 126
- Last commit
- Jul 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
using-loopkit- Source
- github.com/archive228/loopkit