vibe-doc-quality-gate
SkillDocs & knowledgePerforms a fast 6-point quality check for technical documents (specs, design docs, READMEs). Use after editing any specification or design document.
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the vibe-doc-quality-gate skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by ash1794/vibe-engineering in plugins/vibe-engineering/skills/vibe-doc-quality-gate/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
A fast quality gate for technical documents. Not a deep review — just catches the obvious structural issues.
When to Use This Skill
- After creating or editing a specification document
- After writing a design doc or technical RFC
- Before sharing a document for review
- Periodic document health checks
When NOT to Use This Skill
- For code review (use
vibe-quality-looporvibe-devil-advocate-review) - For informal notes or scratch documents
- For README files that are just getting started
The 6 Checks
1. Overview/Quick Start
Does the document have an overview or quick-start section that explains what this is and why it matters in <5 paragraphs?
- PASS: Overview exists with purpose and scope
- FAIL: No overview, or jumps straight into details
2. Structural Completeness
Does the document reference concrete artifacts?
- At least 3 file paths or API endpoints
- At least 1 data structure or type definition
- At least 1 error case or failure mode
- At least 3 test cases or validation steps
- PASS: All present | WARN: 2-3 present | FAIL: 0-1 present
3. Cross-Reference Integrity
Are references to other documents, APIs, or code valid?
- Check that referenced files exist
- Check that referenced types/functions exist
- PASS: All references valid | FAIL: Broken references found
4. Test Coverage
Does the document specify how to verify the implementation?
- At least 3 test cases for small docs
- At least 10 for large docs
- PASS: Adequate test coverage | WARN: Below threshold
5. Command Accuracy
Are commands, paths, and code snippets accurate?
- Do file paths exist (or are marked "to be created")?
- Do commands actually run?
- PASS: All verified | FAIL: Broken commands/paths
6. Self-Sufficiency
Could someone implement this without asking questions?
- Pick 3 random sections. Could you implement each without external context?
- PASS: Yes | FAIL: Ambiguous or incomplete sections
Output Format
Document Quality Gate: [Document Name]
Overall: PASS / WARN / FAIL
| Check | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Overview | ✓/✗ | [notes] |
| 2. Structure | ✓/◐/✗ | [X/4 artifacts] |
| 3. Cross-refs | ✓/✗ | [X broken] |
| 4. Tests | ✓/◐ | [X cases] |
| 5. Commands | ✓/✗ | [X broken] |
| 6. Self-sufficiency | ✓/✗ | [notes] |
Issues to Fix
- [Specific issue with location]
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 85
- Forks
- 20
- Last commit
- Oct 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
vibe-doc-quality-gate- Source
- github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineering
github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineering
Related picks
Skill · agricidaniel
The pick for Markdownmarkdown-formatter
Skill · nvidia
The pick for Markdownhandoff
Skill · mattpocock
More in Docs & knowledgecanvas-design
Skill · anthropics
More in Docs & knowledgedoc-coauthoring
Skill · anthropics
More in Docs & knowledgewriting-for-agents
Skill · mattpocock
More in Docs & knowledge