Vigilante GitHub Actions Issue Implementation

SkillDev tools

Implement a GitHub issue end-to-end when Vigilante dispatches work for a repository with GitHub Actions workflows, applying workflow hardening, pinned actions, and secret-safe automation practices.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Vigilante GitHub Actions Issue Implementation skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by aliengiraffe/vigilante in skills/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-github-actions/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Focus

  • Read the prompt for detected tech stacks, process hints, and security guidance before changing workflow files.
  • Keep changes scoped to the issue and do not broaden into unrelated workflow or repository changes.
  • Treat .github/workflows/ as a security-sensitive surface. Every workflow edit should consider permissions, secret exposure, and supply-chain risk.

Workflow File Conventions

  • Use .yml or .yaml consistently with the repository's existing convention. Do not mix extensions within the same repository.
  • Validate workflow syntax before committing. Use actionlint when it is available in the repository or installed locally. If actionlint is not available, note its absence and continue — do not fabricate output.
  • Keep workflow files readable: use clear job and step names, add inline comments for non-obvious logic, and prefer reusable workflows or composite actions over duplicated step blocks.

Pinned Actions

  • Pin third-party actions to full commit SHAs, not mutable tags or branch references. Example: uses: actions/checkout@<full-sha> with a trailing version comment.
  • When updating an action version, verify the new SHA corresponds to a reviewed release or tag.
  • First-party GitHub actions (actions/*) should also be pinned to SHAs for consistency and supply-chain safety.
  • When adding a new third-party action, prefer well-maintained actions with high community adoption. Avoid actions that request broad permissions or lack clear provenance.

Least-Privilege Permissions

  • Always declare a top-level permissions: block in workflow files. Default to the most restrictive set needed.
  • Use read-only contents: read unless the workflow must write (e.g., creating releases, pushing tags, commenting on PRs).
  • Scope token permissions per job when different jobs need different access levels.
  • Never use permissions: write-all or leave permissions unspecified, which defaults to broad access in some repository configurations.

Secret and Credential Safety

  • Never echo, log, or interpolate secrets directly in run: shell commands. Pass secrets through environment variables.
  • Use ::add-mask:: to mask dynamic values that may appear in logs.
  • Prefer OIDC-based authentication (e.g., aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials with role-to-assume) over long-lived cloud credentials stored as repository secrets.
  • Do not store secrets, tokens, or credentials in workflow files or committed configuration.
  • When a workflow needs elevated access, document why in a comment and scope the access as narrowly as possible.

Safe Workflow Authoring

  • Never interpolate untrusted event data (such as ${{ github.event.pull_request.title }} or ${{ github.event.issue.body }}) directly into run: shell scripts. Use an intermediate environment variable to prevent script injection.
  • Prefer pull_request over pull_request_target unless cross-fork access is explicitly required and the workflow is hardened against injection.
  • Use concurrency groups to prevent redundant or conflicting workflow runs.
  • Set appropriate timeout-minutes on jobs to prevent hung runners from consuming resources.

Reusable Workflows and Composite Actions

  • Prefer the repository's existing reusable workflows and composite actions over duplicating logic.
  • When creating new reusable workflows, define clear inputs and secrets contracts.
  • Respect the repository's branch-protection rules and required status checks when adding or modifying workflows.

Mixed-Stack Repositories

  • A repository with GitHub Actions workflows often also contains application code in Go, Node.js, Python, or other languages.
  • Scope workflow-specific guidance to .github/workflows/ and related CI/CD configuration only. Do not apply workflow linting or hardening rules to application source code.
  • When an issue touches both workflow files and application code, validate each side with its appropriate toolchain.
  • Check the prompt for additional detected tech stacks and follow their respective guidance for non-workflow changes.

Workflow

  • Follow the base vigilante-issue-implementation workflow for issue comments, validation, push, and PR creation, including stacked base-branch detection (Base branch: directive in the issue body).
  • Use vigilante commit for all commit-producing operations. Do not use git commit or GitHub CLI commit flows directly.
  • Any commit or amend must preserve the user's existing git author, committer, and signing configuration. Commit on behalf of the user and do not overwrite git config with a coding-agent identity.
  • Do not add Co-authored by: trailers or any other agent attribution for Codex, Claude, Gemini, or similar coding-agent identities.
  • Repository-specific instructions (AGENTS.md, README.md, CI config) remain authoritative when they are more specific than the generic GitHub Actions guidance in this skill.

Signals

GitHub stars
40
Forks
7
Last commit
Sep 2026

ahel review

  • S4info
    community integration — published by aliengiraffe, not github

Automated review, not a security audit. Ruleset v1.

Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
vigilante-issue-implementation-on-github-actions
Source
github.com/aliengiraffe/vigilante