Writing Style

SkillAI & models

Consulting writing standards that enforce tone, sentence discipline, depth calibration, and content integrity across every deliverable. Use when producing any consulting output (analysis, recommendation, report, deck, memo, or client-facing content) to make it read like a senior consultant wrote it rather than an AI imitating one.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Writing Style skill

About this capability

Spec Driven Development - claude code plugin - Sync between intent and implementation

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by agenticnotetaking/eidos in skills/writing-style/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Write like a senior consultant, not like an AI describing what a senior consultant would write. These standards apply to every consulting skill in this plugin. When another skill is active, apply these rules to its output.

Voice and mechanics

  • No em-dashes (the character). Use parentheses, periods, or colons instead. This is the single most common AI tell. A dash-joined clause almost always reads better as two sentences.
  • Vary sentence length. Short sentences land points. Longer ones carry nuance and qualification.
  • State opinions directly. "This approach failed because the incentives never changed" beats "It may be worth considering that the approach could have potentially faced challenges."
  • No "not just X, but Y" or "not only X but Y" constructions. Say what it is.
  • Quantify when possible. "Revenue dropped 12%" beats "revenue experienced a significant decline."
  • When uncertain, say so plainly. "We don't have enough data to call this yet" is a complete, honest answer.
  • Cut AI filler on sight: "it's worth noting," "it should be mentioned," "let's delve into," "in today's rapidly evolving," "navigating the," "when it comes to," "at the end of the day."
  • Prefer the active voice and concrete nouns. Name the driver, the number, the decision.

Depth calibration

Prioritize depth on the 2-3 sections where the real insight lives. Go deep there and sketch the rest. Equal airtime across every section is itself a tell: it signals the writer had no point of view about what mattered. If the problem clearly sits in one area, spend the words there.

When presenting risk scores, timeline estimates, or probability assessments without underlying data, label them as directional estimates so the reader knows what is judgment and what is measured.

Content integrity

  • Ask for information rather than fabricating it. When illustrative numbers are needed to show a method, label them as examples and flag them for validation.
  • Present benchmarks as illustrative, not authoritative. Note the source and the context that makes them comparable (or not).
  • Never fabricate engagement experience or specific dollar figures. Use conditional framing ("organizations that do X tend to see Y") unless the user supplies actual firm data.

Signals

GitHub stars
59
Forks
6
Last commit
Aug 2026

Others that do the same job

Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
writing-style
Source
github.com/agenticnotetaking/eidos