Improving models & hyperparameter tuning
SkillSearchUse when improving or comparing Ultralytics YOLO models in Platform or code, or running hyperparameter search/autotraining — Platform experiment comparison, the systematic improvement playbook, model.tune() genetic evolution, Ray Tune, search spaces, and deciding whether tuning is worthwhile. For one training run and its arguments, see yolo-training.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Improving models & hyperparameter tuning skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by ultralytics/skills in skills/yolo-tuning/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
The improvement playbook (follow in order — tuning is the LAST step)
Hyperparameter tuning is expensive and usually not the bottleneck. Escalate in this order, re-validating after each step:
- Fix the data — check
confusion_matrix.pngandtrain_batch*.jpgfor label noise; review the top false-negative/false-positive val images; add examples of failing classes and true-background images. Data quality beats every other lever. - Train longer — if val mAP was still rising at the end: more
epochs, higherpatience. - Bigger input — small objects or mAP50 ≫ mAP50-95: raise
imgsz(640 → 960/1280). - Bigger model — underfitting (train and val both mediocre): n → s → m → l.
- Domain-matched augmentation — aerial
degrees=180 flipud=0.5, crowded scenescopy_paste=0.3/mixup=0.1, color-critical classes lowerhsv_h(see yolo-training'straining-args.md). - Only now: hyperparameter tuning — worth ~0.5–2 mAP when everything above is exhausted.
Decision signals: overfitting (val drops while train improves) → more data/aug or smaller model, NOT tuning. Underfitting → bigger model/longer, NOT tuning. Label noise in the confusion matrix → nothing else matters until fixed.
Compare experiments in Platform
Keep candidates in one Platform project.
Train from the New Model dialog, or stream local runs by setting
project=username/project-slug and a unique name. Select models together in the
project charts, or use Table > Diff to compare training arguments and final metrics.
Platform is the experiment owner and visualization layer; the built-in genetic tuner and
Ray Tune below remain Python workflows. Use a completed Platform model as the next base
checkpoint, or download its .pt file, after the comparison identifies a winner.
Built-in genetic tuner
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO("yolo26n.pt")
model.tune(data="data.yaml", epochs=30, iterations=300, plots=False, save=False, val=False)
Tuning is Python-only — there is no yolo tune CLI mode (MODES are
train/val/predict/export/track/benchmark).
- Each iteration = one full (short) training with mutated hyperparameters; fitness is read from the run's val metrics.
- Default search space: 26 keys —
lr0,lrf,momentum,weight_decay,warmup_epochs,warmup_momentum, loss weights (box,cls,cls_pw,dfl), all augmentation knobs (hsv_*,degrees,translate,scale,shear,perspective,flipud,fliplr,bgr,mosaic,mixup,cutmix,copy_paste),close_mosaic. - Custom space (subset + ranges as
(min, max)):model.tune(data="data.yaml", epochs=30, iterations=100, space={"lr0": (1e-5, 1e-1), "mosaic": (0.5, 1.0)}) - Results:
runs/<task>/tune/—best_hyperparameters.yaml,tune_results.ndjson, fitness plots. Load the yaml and retrain fully with it. - Distributed tuning across machines: pass
mongodb_uri=(+ optionalmongodb_db=,mongodb_collection=) — workers share one result pool via MongoDB.
Ray Tune (advanced search algorithms, parallel trials)
model = YOLO("yolo26n.pt")
result_grid = model.tune(use_ray=True, data="data.yaml", iterations=20, epochs=30, gpu_per_trial=1)
- Requires
pip install "ray[tune]". Default scheduler is ASHA (early-kills bad trials aftergrace_periodepochs, default 10). search_alg=accepts Ax, BOHB, Nevergrad, ZOOpt, Optuna, HyperOpt, HEBO, BayesOpt, or"random"(string, or an object for Ax/BOHB/ZOOpt) instead of random search.- Optional W&B logging if
wandbis installed. Use Ray when you have multiple GPUs to parallelize trials or want smarter-than-genetic search; the built-in tuner is simpler and has no extra dependency.
Evolution best practices ("autotraining" recipe)
- Search cheap, retrain expensive: tune with a small model (
n/s), reducedepochs(~30),plots=False save=False val=False; then retrain the best config at full size/epochs. - Budget: iterations × epochs × time-per-epoch. 100–300 iterations is a realistic minimum for the genetic tuner to beat defaults.
- Keep
datafixed during the search — changing data invalidates all prior fitness. - One fitness target: the tuner optimizes the task's default metric (e.g. mAP50-95(B)); confirm that matches what you actually care about before burning GPU days.
- Sanity-check the winner on the val AND test split — tuned configs can overfit the val split when iterations are high.
If the installed version rejects an argument (yolo checks shows the version), trust
the error text and yolo cfg over this file.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 22
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
ahel review
K1binfo
installs-packages
Automated review, not a security audit. Ruleset v1+k2.
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
yolo-tuning- Source
- github.com/ultralytics/skills