Clinical Research Guide
SkillMediaDesign clinical studies and report using CONSORT, STROBE guidelines
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the Clinical Research Guide skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills in skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/biomedical/clinical-research-guide/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
A skill for designing clinical studies and reporting results according to established guidelines. Covers randomized controlled trials (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), diagnostic studies (STARD), and systematic reviews (PRISMA).
Study Design Selection
Hierarchy of Evidence
Systematic Reviews / Meta-analyses
|
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
|
Cohort Studies (prospective)
|
Case-Control Studies
|
Cross-Sectional Studies
|
Case Reports / Case Series
|
Expert Opinion
Choose the design that best answers your research question
given ethical, practical, and resource constraints.
Design Decision Framework
def select_study_design(research_question: str,
can_randomize: bool,
outcome_prevalence: str,
time_constraint: str) -> dict:
"""
Guide selection of clinical study design.
Args:
research_question: The clinical question
can_randomize: Whether randomization is ethical and feasible
outcome_prevalence: 'common' or 'rare'
time_constraint: 'short', 'medium', or 'long'
"""
if can_randomize:
design = {
"recommended": "Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)",
"reporting": "CONSORT 2010",
"strengths": "Strongest causal inference",
"considerations": [
"Need equipoise (genuine uncertainty about which is better)",
"Blinding may or may not be feasible",
"Intent-to-treat analysis is the primary approach",
"Pre-register at ClinicalTrials.gov or ISRCTN"
]
}
elif outcome_prevalence == "rare":
design = {
"recommended": "Case-Control Study",
"reporting": "STROBE",
"strengths": "Efficient for rare outcomes",
"considerations": [
"Select controls carefully (matching, population-based)",
"Recall bias is a major threat",
"Can only calculate odds ratios, not incidence"
]
}
elif time_constraint == "short":
design = {
"recommended": "Cross-Sectional Study",
"reporting": "STROBE (cross-sectional extension)",
"strengths": "Quick, inexpensive, good for prevalence",
"considerations": [
"Cannot establish temporal sequence",
"Prevalence bias (overrepresents chronic conditions)",
"Useful for hypothesis generation"
]
}
else:
design = {
"recommended": "Prospective Cohort Study",
"reporting": "STROBE",
"strengths": "Can establish temporal sequence, multiple outcomes",
"considerations": [
"Loss to follow-up is the main threat",
"Confounding must be addressed analytically",
"Expensive and time-consuming"
]
}
return design
CONSORT for Randomized Trials
Essential CONSORT Checklist Items
Title and Abstract:
- Identify as randomized trial in the title
- Structured abstract with trial design, methods, results, conclusions
Methods:
- Trial design (parallel, crossover, factorial, etc.)
- Participants: Eligibility criteria, settings, locations
- Interventions: Precise details of interventions for each group
- Outcomes: Primary and secondary, how and when assessed
- Sample size: Calculation with assumptions stated
- Randomization: Sequence generation, allocation concealment
- Blinding: Who was blinded, how blinding was maintained
Results:
- CONSORT flow diagram (enrollment, allocation, follow-up, analysis)
- Baseline demographic table (Table 1)
- Primary outcome with effect size and confidence interval
- Harms and adverse events
Discussion:
- Limitations including sources of potential bias
- Generalizability
- Interpretation consistent with results
CONSORT Flow Diagram
Assessed for eligibility (n=...)
|
Excluded (n=...)
- Not meeting criteria (n=...)
- Declined to participate (n=...)
- Other reasons (n=...)
|
Randomized (n=...)
/ \
Allocated to Allocated to
intervention (n=...) control (n=...)
| |
Lost to follow-up Lost to follow-up
(n=..., reasons) (n=..., reasons)
| |
Analyzed (n=...) Analyzed (n=...)
Excluded from analysis Excluded from analysis
(n=..., reasons) (n=..., reasons)
STROBE for Observational Studies
Key STROBE Requirements
Study design specific items:
Cohort:
- Report follow-up time (person-years, median)
- Report loss to follow-up with reasons
- Use hazard ratios or incidence rate ratios
Case-Control:
- Describe case definition and case ascertainment
- Describe control selection (source, matching criteria)
- Report odds ratios with confidence intervals
Cross-Sectional:
- Report response rate and non-response analysis
- Describe how the sample represents the target population
- Report prevalence with confidence intervals
Sample Size and Power
Power Calculation
def power_analysis_rct(effect_size: float, alpha: float = 0.05,
power: float = 0.80, ratio: float = 1.0) -> dict:
"""
Calculate required sample size for a two-arm RCT.
Args:
effect_size: Expected Cohen's d
alpha: Significance level (two-sided)
power: Desired statistical power
ratio: Allocation ratio (control:treatment)
"""
from scipy import stats
import math
z_alpha = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2)
z_beta = stats.norm.ppf(power)
n_per_arm = math.ceil(
((z_alpha + z_beta) ** 2 * (1 + 1 / ratio)) / effect_size ** 2
)
return {
"n_per_arm": n_per_arm,
"total_n": n_per_arm + math.ceil(n_per_arm * ratio),
"parameters": {
"effect_size": effect_size,
"alpha": alpha,
"power": power,
"allocation_ratio": f"1:{ratio}"
},
"note": "Add 10-20% for anticipated dropout"
}
Other Reporting Guidelines
| Guideline | Study Type | Checklist Items |
|---|---|---|
| CONSORT | Randomized trials | 25 items + flow diagram |
| STROBE | Observational studies | 22 items |
| STARD | Diagnostic accuracy studies | 30 items |
| PRISMA | Systematic reviews | 27 items + flow diagram |
| TRIPOD | Prediction models | 22 items |
| SPIRIT | Trial protocols | 33 items |
| CARE | Case reports | 13 items |
All checklists are available at the EQUATOR Network (equator-network.org). Most journals require submission of the relevant checklist with your manuscript. Completing the checklist during manuscript writing, not after, ensures comprehensive reporting.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 531
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
clinical-research-guide- Source
- github.com/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills
github.com/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills
Related picks
Skill · wshobson
The pick for Pythonpython-pro
Skill · jeffallan
The pick for Pythonacademic-paper-composer
Skill · brycewang-stanford
The pick for Academic03-academic-writing
Skill · 24kchengye
The pick for Academicprototype
Skill · mattpocock
More in Mediabrand-guidelines
Skill · anthropics
More in Media