JAMA Pediatrics (jama-pediatrics)
SkillMediaUse when targeting JAMA Pediatrics or deciding whether a child- or adolescent-health study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the pediatric clinical and population-research evidence bar, pediatric design and ethics requirements, reporting-guideline and trial-registration expectations, JAMA Network house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the JAMA Pediatrics (jama-pediatrics) skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills in Clinical-Medicine-Journal-Skills/skills/jama-pediatrics/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Journal positioning
JAMA Pediatrics is a JAMA Network specialty journal for clinical and population research on the health of infants, children, and adolescents. It favors rigorous, practice- and policy-relevant work — randomized pediatric trials, large child-health cohorts and population studies, prevention and developmental research, and health- services analyses — with JAMA's emphasis on age-appropriate outcomes, adequate power, and direct relevance to child and adolescent care. Studies that simply extrapolate adult findings, small descriptive series, and work using adult-derived outcomes without pediatric validation are a weak fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid; it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live JAMA Pediatrics author instructions.
When to trigger
- The author names JAMA Pediatrics for a child- or adolescent-health clinical, developmental, or population study and wants a fit/framing check.
- A pediatric study must be re-framed around an age-appropriate, developmentally valid outcome for a child-health readership.
- The author is choosing between JAMA Pediatrics, JAMA, and a pediatric-subspecialty journal.
- The author needs the journal's pediatric-specific design, ethics (assent/parental consent), reporting-guideline, registration, and desk-reject expectations.
Scope & topic fit
- Randomized pediatric trials (therapeutic, behavioral, preventive, or vaccine) with age-appropriate primary outcomes, including pragmatic designs.
- Large child- and adolescent-health cohorts, birth cohorts, and population/registry studies with rigorous confounding control.
- Developmental, neurodevelopmental, growth, nutrition, and early-life-exposure studies with validated pediatric measures.
- Adolescent health, mental-health, injury-prevention, and child-maltreatment research with appropriate sensitivity and ethics.
- Pediatric health-services, quality, vaccine-policy, and disparities research.
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses answering a focused child-health question.
Method & evidence bar
- Trials and studies must use age- and developmentally appropriate, validated outcome measures and be adequately powered; adult-derived endpoints need pediatric validation.
- The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are required: CONSORT for trials, STROBE for observational studies, PRISMA for systematic reviews; report stratification by age/developmental stage where relevant.
- Trials require prospective registration; registration number, protocol, and statistical-analysis plan are expected.
- Pediatric ethics must be explicit: IRB approval, parental/guardian permission, child assent appropriate to age, and protections for vulnerable populations (neonates, adolescents, maltreatment).
- Observational and exposure claims must address confounding, family clustering, and missing data; causal language must match the design.
- Long-term developmental outcomes need adequate follow-up and handling of attrition.
Structure & house style
- JAMA Network format with a structured abstract and a Key Points box; re-check current article types (Original Investigation, Brief Report, Research Letter, etc.) and limits on the live guide.
- The introduction frames a focused, child-health-relevant question; the discussion states the clinical, developmental, or policy implication plainly.
- Tables/figures follow JAMA Network statistical-reporting standards; CONSORT/STROBE flow diagrams and age-stratified results are expected where applicable.
- Supplements carry the protocol, SAP, consent/assent documentation summary, and additional analyses.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE and JAMA Network anchors, then cite the current JAMA Pediatrics page you checked. - Search the live site for "JAMA Pediatrics instructions for authors" and follow the current version.
- Re-check article types and word/reference/table limits, structured-abstract and Key Points format, and the JAMA Network statistical-reporting requirements.
- Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), the data-sharing statement, and protocol/SAP submission.
- Re-check IRB/ethics, parental consent and child assent, vulnerable-population protections, ICMJE disclosures, funding, and AI-use disclosure.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- The study answers a child-/adolescent-health question with age-appropriate, validated outcomes.
- The primary outcome is prespecified and developmentally valid; the study is adequately powered, stratified by age where relevant.
- The correct reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA) is completed and attached.
- Trials are prospectively registered with the number in the manuscript; protocol/SAP provided.
- Pediatric ethics are explicit: IRB, parental consent, child assent, and vulnerable-population protections.
- ICMJE disclosures and a data-sharing statement are prepared; confounding and attrition are addressed.
Common desk-reject triggers
- Adult findings extrapolated to children, or adult-derived outcomes used without pediatric validation.
- Small descriptive pediatric series with no clear practice, developmental, or policy implication.
- Missing or inadequate assent/parental-consent and vulnerable-population protections.
- Observational analyses with unaddressed confounding/family clustering or overstated causal claims.
- Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
- Narrow pediatric-subspecialty interest better served by a subspecialty journal.
Re-routing decision
- Broadly practice-changing, top-tier pediatric trial → general medicine (
jama/ NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle). - Adult internal-medicine relevance over pediatrics →
jama-internal-medicine. - Child/adolescent mental-health primary focus →
jama-psychiatry/the-lancet-psychiatry. - Pediatric neurological/developmental-neurology focus →
jama-neurology/brain. - Pediatric surgical or perioperative focus →
jama-surgery.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] JAMA Pediatrics
[Specialty tags] <2–3 closest child-/adolescent-health topics>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA>
[Method/evidence] <does power, age-appropriate outcome, registration, and pediatric ethics clear the bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / assent-consent / ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 155
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
jama-pediatrics- Source
- github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills
github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills