openspec-propose
SkillMediaPropose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the openspec-propose skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by po4yka/ripdpi in .agents/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
RIPDPI policy: use only the local repository planning home. OpenSpec stores, global configuration changes, direct archive, and telemetry are out of scope; ./taskctl enforces the pinned tool and disables telemetry.
Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
Planning boundary: This workflow creates planning artifacts only. The user request that selected or triggered this workflow authorizes planning only, even if it asks to build or fix something. Do not edit project code. After the planning artifacts are complete, stop. Do not start implementation in the same response, even if the initial request asks for it. Wait for a new user request after the artifacts are presented; then start the apply workflow.
I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:
- proposal.md (what & why)
specs/<capability-path>/spec.md(what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)- design.md (how)
- tasks.md (implementation steps)
<capability-path> is the spec directory relative to specs/ (for example, user-auth or identity/user-auth). Preserve an existing capability's full path and follow the project's established organization for new capabilities.
When the user is ready to implement, they must start the apply workflow explicitly.
Repository root: Work only in the current RIPDPI checkout. Do not select or register OpenSpec stores. Run every CLI lookup through ./taskctl openspec cli from the repository root.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
-
Understand the request and clarify material ambiguity
If no clear input is provided, ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
If the request contains ambiguity that would materially affect scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria, ask the user before creating the change. For minor details, make a reasonable assumption and record it in the planning artifacts.
-
Determine the workflow schema
Use the configured default schema unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.
Use a different schema only if the user:
- Explicitly requests a specific schema by name → use
--schema <schema-name> - Asks to "show workflows" or asks "what workflows" exist → resolve the authoritative root by running
./taskctl openspec cli context --jsonfrom the current working directory. If the user explicitly selected a registered store, use./taskctl openspec cli context --json --store "<store-id>". Then run./taskctl openspec cli schemas --jsonwith its working directory set to the returnedroot.pathand let them choose. This preserves roots selected by a localstore:pointer or the globaldefaultStore;schemasdoes not accept--store. If context reports onlyno_openspec_root, run./taskctl openspec cli schemas --jsonfrom the current working directory instead. Do not use this fallback for invalid or unavailable stores.
Otherwise, omit
--schemato preserve the configured default. - Explicitly requests a specific schema by name → use
-
Create the change directory
Choose one schema form below. If a registered store is selected, append
--store "<store-id>"to that command and each later OpenSpec command shown below that accepts--store.Using the configured default:
./taskctl openspec cli new change "<name>"Using an explicitly requested schema:
./taskctl openspec cli new change "<name>" --schema "<schema-name>"This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with
.openspec.yaml. -
Get the artifact build order
./taskctl openspec cli status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to get:
applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g.,["tasks"])artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with itsstatusand itsrequiresedges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)planningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andactionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
Create every artifact in the required set
Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. For each artifact that is
ready(dependencies satisfied):- Get instructions:
./taskctl openspec cli instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - The instructions JSON includes:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact typeskipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifactresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
- If the
instructionfield delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists atresolvedOutputPath - Otherwise create the artifact file using
templateas the structure and write it toresolvedOutputPath. IfresolvedOutputPathis a glob, followinstructionto choose the concrete file path - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file - Show brief progress: "Created "
b. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just
apply.requires)- After creating each artifact, re-run
./taskctl openspec cli status --change "<name>" --json - The required set is
applyRequiresplus every artifact reachable from those by following therequiresedges instatus --json- walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone statusis file-existence only, so anapplyRequiresartifact readingdonedoes NOT mean its dependencies exist - writingtasks.mdearly markstasksdone whilespecswas never written. Use each artifact'srequiresedges, not itsstatus, to build the required set: adoneartifact still lists what it depends on- An artifact already reading
status: "skipped"is satisfied: the change declaresskip_specsin.openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
- Skip one only when
statusalready reports itskipped, or when its owninstructionsays it is conditional: run./taskctl openspec cli instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --jsonand skip only if itsinstructionfield marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven'sdesign.mdqualifies;specsqualifies only via theskippedstatus above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still
blockedonly because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway - Stop when every artifact in the required set is
done,skipped, or was deliberately skipped
c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):
- Ask the user to clarify
- Then continue with creation
- Get instructions:
-
Show final status
./taskctl openspec cli status --change "<name>"
Output
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
- Change name and location
- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
- What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
- Prompt: "The artifacts are ready for review. When you are ready, run
$openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents)or ask me to apply this change."
Artifact Creation Guidelines
- Follow the
instructionfield from./taskctl openspec cli instructionsfor each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names - If the
instructionfield directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly - The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
- Use
templateas the structure for your output file - fill in its sections - IMPORTANT:
contextandrulesare constraints for YOU, not content for the file- Do NOT copy
<context>,<rules>,<project_context>blocks into the artifact - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
- Do NOT copy
Guardrails
- The request that invoked this workflow authorizes planning only. Any implementation or apply instruction in that request does not carry forward. Do NOT implement the change, start the apply workflow, or edit project code during this workflow. After presenting the artifacts, stop and wait for a new user request to start the apply workflow
- Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in
apply.requires - Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
- Ask about ambiguities that would materially change scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria; for minor details, make reasonable assumptions and record them
- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 69
- Forks
- 4
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
openspec-propose-po4yka- Source
- github.com/po4yka/ripdpi