Product Design and UX
SkillMediaDefine user-facing product behavior from validated evidence and approved scope. Use for information architecture, task flows, state and recovery models, interface contracts, usability-study plans, interaction-pattern tradeoffs, or engineering UX handoffs. Use after product discovery and product decisions; route WCAG/ARIA conformance work to web-accessibility and formal software specifications to spec-driven-development. Do not use this skill for unrelated requests; route to the nearest named specialist.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Product Design and UX skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by magnus919/agent-skills in product-design-and-ux/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Turn validated evidence and chosen scope into observable behavior people can complete and recover from. Design the interaction, not the brand, pixels, CSS, component implementation, or a particular tool.
Entry Check
Confirm the approved scope, outcome, users or roles, evidence links, constraints, measurable experience goals, and open product decisions. Record missing inputs rather than inventing them.
- Need stakeholder evidence, validation, or raw research? Use product-discovery.
- Need prioritization, scope, or why a feature is being built? Use product-methodology.
- Need WCAG, ARIA, native semantics, or accessibility testing depth? Use web-accessibility.
- Need an approved interaction contract translated into a software specification and delivery gates? Use spec-driven-development.
Workflow
- Trace each outcome and design decision to evidence with
templates/outcomes-to-design.md. Optional personas or jobs must change a decision and cite evidence; do not create decorative demographics. - Establish information architecture from goals, content objects, terminology, permissions, findability, and service context. Read
references/information-architecture.md. - Define consequential labels, instructions, status, errors, and completion content; review the task's memory, choice, switching, interruption, and recovery demands. Use heuristics to generate testable questions, not verdicts. Read
references/content-and-cognitive-demand.md. - Model important tasks, including forces that create decisions, alternatives, interruption, re-entry, cancellation, recovery, irreversible actions, side effects, permission changes, and completion evidence. Read
references/task-flows-and-state-models.mdand usetemplates/task-flow-state-model.md. - Inventory only states forced by the flow, data, permissions, connectivity, and risk. Record risky omissions. Use
templates/screen-state-inventory.md. - Write framework-neutral contracts for content, controls, accessible interaction requirements, actions, transitions, persistence, permissions, responsive/reflow behavior, telemetry, and open decisions. Read
references/interface-contracts-and-responsive-behavior.mdand usetemplates/interface-contract.md. - Treat patterns as hypotheses. Compare alternatives, tradeoffs, evidence, and disconfirming conditions with
references/interaction-pattern-selection.md. - Plan or synthesize only authorized usability work. Read
references/usability-testing-and-privacy.md; usetemplates/usability-study.md. Never invent participants, consent, observations, quotes, or results. - Produce an engineering handoff with observable acceptance evidence, dependencies, owners, gates, and deployed-boundary verification. Read
references/engineering-handoff.md; usetemplates/engineering-handoff.md. Hand approved behavior to spec-driven-development.
Load On Demand
| Need | Load |
|---|---|
| Scope boundary, traceability, or adjacent-skill routing | references/boundaries-and-traceability.md |
| Goals, labels, navigation, findability, permissions | references/information-architecture.md |
| Plain-language content, heuristic review, cognitive demand | references/content-and-cognitive-demand.md |
| Task paths, state applicability, recovery, side effects | references/task-flows-and-state-models.md |
| Interaction contract or inclusive responsive behavior | references/interface-contracts-and-responsive-behavior.md |
| Pattern alternatives and decision evidence | references/interaction-pattern-selection.md |
| Usability protocol, synthesis, consent, or privacy | references/usability-testing-and-privacy.md |
| Handoff, acceptance criteria, or deployed verification | references/engineering-handoff.md |
| Methodology self-check with synthetic fixtures | references/scenario-probes.md |
| Source authority, status, and examples | references/source-index.md |
Guardrails
- Accessibility is designed throughout, but WCAG/ARIA/native-semantics and testing depth remain with
web-accessibility. - Specify behavior under relevant width, zoom/reflow, text expansion/localization, orientation, input modes, reduced motion, degraded connectivity, interruption, and re-entry. Do not use device breakpoints as the model.
- Use synthetic fixtures such as
sample-user@example.testandINV-DEMO-042; never request real credentials, payments, financial access, or secrets for an unsafe prototype. - A finding from usability work is bounded evidence, not accessibility conformance, population prevalence, analytics, or outcome proof.
Completion
Stop when every in-scope behavior has traceable evidence, an applicable state/recovery model, observable acceptance criteria, and either a resolved decision or an owner and resolution gate. Report limitations and untested risks rather than filling gaps with assumptions.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 78
- Forks
- 8
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
product-design-and-ux- Source
- github.com/magnus919/agent-skills