Scientific Workflow Tools
SkillMediaResearch-method workflow guide for hypothesis framing, peer-review style critique, reproducibility planning, study-design checks, and scientific-writing structure. Use when the user asks for manuscript critique, research-gap framing, hypothesis generation, reproducibility checklists, or study-planning support that should stay on the research side rather than patient-care decisions.
Use Scientific Workflow Tools in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop
Free. Sign in, add Scientific Workflow Tools and connect your AI. About a minute.
Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex
Then ask your AI: use the Scientific Workflow Tools skill
Details
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; Ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
No other account needed.
Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by drugclaw/drugclaw in skills/science/scientific-workflow-tools/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.
Use this skill when the user needs higher-level research method support rather than raw database lookup or computation.
Typical triggers:
- generate or compare mechanistic hypotheses from observations
- review a manuscript draft for rigor, missing controls, or overstated claims
- build a reproducibility checklist before submission or release
- structure a scientific report, review, or response-to-reviewers plan
- identify missing controls, statistical gaps, or reporting-standard issues
Bundled Asset
templates/reproducibility_checklist.py
Preferred Workflow
- Restate the research question, claim, or draft under review.
- Separate what is observed from what is inferred.
- Enumerate methodological risks before proposing fixes.
- Use the checklist template to create a durable artifact for reporting or project tracking.
- Keep outputs explicitly on the research side. Do not cross into patient-level diagnosis or treatment planning.
Reproducibility Checklist
python3 templates/reproducibility_checklist.py \
--profile omics \
--output research/omics_checklist.md \
--summary research/omics_checklist.json
Supported baseline profiles:
generalomicsmlclinical-research
Use the generated checklist as a starting artifact, then tailor it to the exact study.
Working Rules
- Hypotheses should be testable and distinguish observation from mechanism.
- Peer-review style critique should prioritize reproducibility, controls, statistics, and claim scope.
- Scientific writing support should strengthen structure and rigor, not fabricate citations or results.
- Reporting-guideline and checklist outputs are planning artifacts, not proof that the study is compliant.
Related Skills
For literature search outputs and evidence tables, activate literature-review-tools.
For clinical-study design and reporting-guideline selection, activate clinical-research-tools.
For numerical statistical execution, activate stat-modeling-tools or survival-analysis-tools.
For experiment suggestion or bounded closed-loop optimization, activate bayesian-optimization-tools.
For figure generation, activate scientific-visualization-tools.
For bioinformatics, chemistry, or docking execution, activate the corresponding domain skill instead of keeping the task abstract.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 125
- Forks
- 9
- Last commit
- Mar 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
scientific-workflow-tools- Source
- github.com/drugclaw/drugclaw
Related picks
Skill · wshobson
The pick for Pythonpython-pro
Skill · jeffallan
The pick for Pythonacademic-paper-composer
Skill · brycewang-stanford
The pick for Academic03-academic-writing
Skill · 24kchengye
The pick for Academicprototype
Skill · mattpocock
More in Mediabrand-guidelines
Skill · anthropics
More in Media